Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 7
  • Benjamin Tubb

    February 24, 2007 at 4:23 pm in reply to: … My render is at 42,949,443.87%. What the heck.

    Hmm. That would make sense… I thought I had set it to work area though… and when I did it the second time, I didn’t change ANY settings and it worked normally.

  • Benjamin Tubb

    February 24, 2007 at 9:13 am in reply to: … My render is at 42,949,443.87%. What the heck.

    Okay… apparently I suck at life, and am incapable of posting a screenshot. So here’s a link.

    https://www.dallasareavideo.com/ppweird.jpg

  • Benjamin Tubb

    February 4, 2007 at 6:25 am in reply to: SATA Drives, out of space in case

    Ah, is that because the table’s 720 HD isn’t compressed with DVCProHD? That would make a whole lot of sense.

    Thanks for all your help.

    Ben Tubb

  • Benjamin Tubb

    February 4, 2007 at 6:23 am in reply to: SATA Drives, out of space in case

    Oh, and on the debt thing:

    I bought the cam new for 5,000.

    I only had 4,000.

  • Benjamin Tubb

    February 4, 2007 at 6:21 am in reply to: SATA Drives, out of space in case

    …. Seriously? If so, that’s good news, and bad news.

    Good, because that’s just saved our whole production.

    Bad, because Creative Cow Magazine lied to me! haha….

    In the first issue, there was a big table that told me 720p/59.94, at 8bit, 4:2:2, takes 6.3 GB a minute, and 376 GB an hour. Now you’re telling me that more than two hours is only 122 GB?

    Wow, I really hope that Bessie lied. That would be helpful…

    So what am I missing there?

  • Benjamin Tubb

    February 4, 2007 at 5:48 am in reply to: SATA Drives, out of space in case

    Ugh. Thanks for your ideas, I’m gonna look into them, but seriously. UGH. When I say we have 325 dollars, I mean, we actually have NO MONEY (We’re paying for this literally out of our own wallets, and mine currently has one dollar in it), and are working at our crappy 7 dollar an hour jobs to collaboratively come up with $325 by the time we need to start shooting.

    When most people say “My budget is this much” they mean that’s how much they are allowed to spend. When I say it, I mean I actually don’t have access to any more than that. I’m already $1,000 dollars in debt because of my HVX-200 (actually $750 in debt now, big paycheck came in, woo!).

    I know what you’re gonna say: “You should have stuck with MiniDV, instead of making the HD jump when you don’t have the cash.”

    This script is awesome, and I don’t want to use up this opportunity on MiniDV. Plus, last time I checked, miniDV SUCKS on a theater screen.

    I’ll try to see if I can sucker more money out of my parents and such, but seriously. UGH.

  • Benjamin Tubb

    February 1, 2007 at 10:54 pm in reply to: 24PN…. 24? or 23.976?

    Thanks guys, great help.

  • Benjamin Tubb

    January 29, 2007 at 6:06 pm in reply to: Does the HVX200p only shoot 16:9?

    In 480i, you can shoot either way.

    There’s 3 recording modes available for 480i on the HVX200p:

    Normal – standard 4:3 recording.

    Letterboxed – 16:9, just 4:3 with the top and bottom chopped off.

    Squeezed – records 16:9 but squeezes it into a 4:3, so you can strecth it back out later for true 16:9.

    Hope that helps,
    Ben Tubb

  • Benjamin Tubb

    June 27, 2006 at 6:01 pm in reply to: 1080i… Upper Field First?

    I know, I was just hoping to see it on my Dad’s new HDTV.

    Thanks,

    Ben Tubb

    “Of course, I could be wrong. In fact, I’m probably wrong.”

  • Benjamin Tubb

    June 27, 2006 at 4:31 pm in reply to: 1080i… Upper Field First?

    … Are you serious? UGH. And to think I was excited that I could do HD in PP2…

    And Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are considerably out of my budget range right now (I’m a high school student making 6.50 an hour) 🙂

    Thanks anyways man,

    Ben Tubb

    “Of course, I could be wrong. In fact, I’m probably wrong.”

Page 2 of 7

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy