As someone who teaches FCP and film making classes at a film school, and who also helps place people into jobs in the film and broadcast industries, I can tell you that PPro has a long way to go before becoming as popular in those industries. Cinema Tools, for one, is the strongest point with FCP, along with other aspects that PPro isn’t up to yet. Color by itself puts FCP far ahead of Adobe’s package right out of the box. The local film/broadcast folks who I consult for feel that Adobe’s “integration” (which is overhyped) is the least of their conserns with an NLE. FCP’s superior compositing is more important to them, it’s extensive XML tools, etc, all that, from what they tell me, matters more.
PPro is a great NLE, and Adobe’s new package is nice. But just cause it’ll be on a Mac doesn’t make it any more appealing to film and broadcast studios.
In the wedding & event videography field, PPro is far more widely used than FCP, it fits that type of work very well. In Film/Broadcast, FCP is so far ahead of Adobe, and with Final Cut Server coming out, it’ll be even further ahead. We get people taking our FCP classes in our film school who are trying to get actual jobs, and are experienced with Avid, PPro, etc, but the jobs they are applying for use FCP. So they’re all rushing to learn it.
I’m not bashing, just stating the facts of the industry. FCP is just to widely used now. Most of the Avid studios here in Hollywood south switched from Avid to FCP after Katrina, and report at this point they wish they’d made the change sooner.
If you want to make a career out of editing, learn FCP and Avid, leave the rest to the wedding videographers (I did weddings for a few years way back when, I know first hand what it takes).
– Apple Certified Trainer
– Tutorials at http://www.bbalser.com
– South Louisiana FCP Users Group
– NOVAC Digital Filmmakers Institute
– Event DV magazine