Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Xvid Mpeg-4 AVI & Vegas Pro 9 – novice

  • Xvid Mpeg-4 AVI & Vegas Pro 9 – novice

    Posted by Pete Jefferson on January 20, 2011 at 6:58 pm

    Hi, I’m a novice using Vegas Pro 9, 64 bit. I’ve got some movies that have been rendered in Xvid mpeg4 using the AVI extension. I’m happy with the size and quality of these videos and would like to create some video (using Vegas) that will use the same codecs.

    By installing an xvid codec I was able to view an xvid AVI file that I was not able to see before with Vegas. I have also been able to edit it, but I am unable to Render the file in the xvid mpeg-4 AVI codecs. It’s my understanding from reading old posts here that even if I install the xvid codecs that it will not work because I am using the 64 bit version of Vegas instead of the 32 bit. However, at least one old post recommended trying Xvid 1.3.0 or Xvid 64 to solve this problem. The Xvid 1.3.0 that I found wasn’t user friendly enough for me to install quickly so I skipped it for now, and I couldn’t find any sort of xvid 64 codecs. Xvid.org only shows codecs for windows x86. So, I’m confused. Is there a way to render projects with xvid mpeg-4 AVI codecs using Vegas Pro 9 64bit?

    If not, the other alternative is to render my project using a similar codecs. I’ve made a few small sample size videos using the render choices offered by Vegas Pro, but it’s hard to know how big movie size files would be without going through the long rendering process for each one. So, I’m looking for what xvid mpeg-4 AVi offers. Decent quality for movie length videos sized around 800 MB. I recently created a large (2 GB) video using the MainConcept AVC/ACC (mp4) format. It was a 3 hour video and it looked good, but it was impossible to navigate. If I tried to skip forward or back it would just hang and freeze. Maybe I’d have better luck with a smaller sized video. I haven’t tried the Sony AVC (mp4,m2ts,avc). I was worried that Sony might make the codecs too proprietary, or is this a common codecs?

    Anyway, I think you get the idea. If not xvid, then what’s a comparable codecs I can use to create decent quality movie length video coming in around 800 MB?

    Thank you for the help!

    Pete Jefferson replied 15 years, 8 months ago 3 Members · 14 Replies
  • 14 Replies
  • John Rofrano

    January 20, 2011 at 11:35 pm

    There is no xvid 64-bit codec and Vegas doesn’t support editing xvid anyway. Try the Sony AVC codec. It produces industry standard AVC/h.264. Nothin’ proprietary about it.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Pete Jefferson

    January 21, 2011 at 12:29 am

    I found this link for xvid-64 in another forum:
    https://forum.videohelp.com/images/guides/p2035729/xvid-i1.2.2-vaq-x64.zip

    After installing it I was able to view and edt my xvid mpeg4 file. So I guess you can at least view and edit xvid files with Vegas Pro 9 64bit, so long as you provide the codecs? There is no option to render as xvid.

    Either way, I’m happy to render with the Sony codecs. I shouldn’t expect any trouble rendering my xvid mp4 as the Sony AVC once the time comes, right? I guess I should do a sample before I get too far in.

    For a different file, I did a Sony AVC render since my last post and I’m happy enough with the results. Thank you for the advice an solution.

  • Dave Haynie

    January 21, 2011 at 9:04 am

    If you’re trying to stuff a standard definition film into 800MB (about 1/2 the bitrate of an Apple iTunes download, about 1/10th the bitrate of a professionally encoded DVD), I would recommend the Main Concept AVC encoder over the Sony.

    Both produce AVC, and I use the Sony encoder for Blu-ray. But the Sony encoder doesn’t support variable bit-rate encoding, which is absolutely essential to optimizing a low bit-rate render. All professionally encoded DVDs are done in VBR, for example. You’re talking about an average bit-rate of 850Kb/s or thereabouts… and that’s not even taking into account audio. So you can set up a render with video at 800,000b/s as an average, maximum of 2,500,000b/s, and audio at 48kb/s, and see how that goes.

    XviD is based on the original DivX CODEC, which is in turn based on MPEG-4 Part 2, also called MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile video. This was an improvement over MPEG-2, but AVC (Advanced Video Coding) is a similar improvement over ASP. And as John pointed out, it’s a standard. In fact, AVC is THE video standard of our times: it’s on Blu-ray, on the web, it’s the primary video CODEC for portable devices, it’s the European high definition broadcast standard, it’s more recently become the most common consumer camcorder recording format, and it’s used on most satellite and even some digital cable TV systems. Microsoft added built-in support for AVC with Windows 7, even though they were never all that good with NIH (Not Invented Here) technology support.

    -Dave

  • Pete Jefferson

    January 21, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    AVC sounds like a winner. I read your post about four times. Thanks for taking the time to explain. The MainConcept AVC might be larger than I want to deal with, but I’ll render a few different versions and see how it looks.

    Thanks for your time.

  • Pete Jefferson

    January 22, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    Hi, I’m back.

    Last night I complied a 2 1/2 documentary imported directly from DVD rendering as MainConcept AVC with a 640×480 template. It came in at 1.54 GB. The file size and quality are good for my purposes but there’s a fatal flaw. I can’t skip around within the video. I can’t slide the timeline, jump ahead, or go back. If I do it just freezes. My CPU is a 2.4Ghz dual core and I have 6 GBs of system memory, but I know this isn’t the problem because other large videos using different codecs allow me to navigate freely.

    As I recall, it took about 4 hrs to render the video so I’ll try again tonight with Sony AVC, but I’m confused about what template to use. This isn’t HD material. The default choice is “Memory Stick SD NTSC – 2128 Kpbs” but I can go as high as 6256 Kbps. It’s all greek to me. I know this is information I could probably harvest from older posts, but I already had this thread going and I won’t have much time to mess with this before starting another 4 hour rendering session at bedtime so any help or advice is appreciated.

    Thanks

  • Pete Jefferson

    January 22, 2011 at 7:08 pm

    Hi, me again.

    Well, I just rendered the same documentary in Sony AVC (Memory Stick SD NTSC – 2128 Kpbs). It came in at 2.23 GB and I can scroll forward and back just fine. However, the picture quality isn’t so hot. I don’t know the technical term but the Sony AVC has an “interlaced” look with the horizontal lines running across. Remember when stand alone DVD players first came out and the newer models had progressive scan? Well, the MainConcept AVC looks like progressive to me and the Sony AVC looks interlaced. But with the Sony AVC I can at least skip around without the video freezing up. Take away the “interlaced” look and I’d say the picture quality is about equal.

    I’ve used slysofts Clone DVD Moblie and they have a setting called Generic AVC. I haven’t tried with a video file as long as 2 1/2 hours, but from what I’ve seen of that it looked good and I was able to skip around. Anyone know what THAT AVC codecs is?

    Well, I’ve spent about 10x longer on this project than I expected to and I’m still not satisfied. Any help, corrections, or suggestions are truly appreciated.

    One correction is that my rendering times have been 2 to 2/12 hours, not 4.

    Thanks.

  • John Rofrano

    January 23, 2011 at 12:18 am

    [Pete Jefferson] “Well, I just rendered the same documentary in Sony AVC (Memory Stick SD NTSC – 2128 Kpbs). It came in at 2.23 GB and I can scroll forward and back just fine. However, the picture quality isn’t so hot. I don’t know the technical term but the Sony AVC has an “interlaced” look with the horizontal lines running across”

    You rendered to NTSC and NTSC requires interlacing for display on a TV. I would not use that template unless your target device is an NTSC TV or similar interlaced device.

    In the memory stick template that you are using, change the Video format from “Memory Stick” to AVC. Then change the Field Order from “Upper Field First” to None (Progressive). That will remove the interlacing lines.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Pete Jefferson

    January 23, 2011 at 2:50 am

    hmmm… the only template choices I see that refer to AVC are AVCHD..

    AVCHD 1440 x 1080-60i
    AVCHD 1440 x 1080-50i
    AVCHD 1920 x 1080-60i
    AVCHD 1920 x 1080-50i

    I’m guessing the HD and those high resolutions suggest high definition and maybe the “i” is for interlaced? I’ll try one but it’s the only thing that has AVC in the choice for Vegas Pro 9. Perhaps I need alternative codecs or I’m just missing something obvious.

    As for Field Order, I seem to be missing that too. I even played around with the custom settings but don’t see what you’re referring to. Maybe this is because I’m using 64 bit?

    I appreciate your patience. I’m sure most of this is pretty fundamental. I’ll try the first AVCHD template just for fun and report back later…

  • John Rofrano

    January 23, 2011 at 3:40 am

    [Pete Jefferson] “hmmm… the only template choices I see that refer to AVC are AVCHD..”

    I’m sorry if I wasn’t clear. I was talking about the template that you are already using, not selecting a new template. Here is what you should do:

    1. Select Sony AVC as the render type
    2. Select Memory Stick SD NTSC – 2128 Kpbs as the template
    3. Press the Customize… button
    4. Change the Video format from “Memory Stick” to AVC
    5. Change the Field Order from “Upper Field First” to None (Progressive)

    That will remove the interlacing lines.

    Here is what the end result should look like:


    Hope that helps,

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Pete Jefferson

    January 23, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    ha ha. You’re a patient man John. Can’t believe I missed that but you’re last post made it impossible to misunderstand. You know it’s you’re old posts on this forum that drew me here in the first place.

    Well, I rendered it as you said and everything is well. Sound, video, file size, and I can scroll to and fro as I please. Thanks John. This is exactly what I wanted to do and now I’ll have a method for future projects. I was working with SD this time but I’ll test out some HD stuff later and see how it converts. Much appreciated!

    Pete

    PS: Let me know if there are any Vegas Pro tutorials you’d recommend.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy