-
Worth the effort? 8 bit AVCHD 1080p 4:2:0 versus 1080i 10 bit uncompressed 4:2:2
Hello,
I did post this on the Color and Motion forum but also seems highly relevant for this forum as well…
I am i homing in on a final MacBook Pro versus Mac Pro decision to enable both real-time capture (argues for portable) and final cut – color – motion work flow.
i have a new sony HXR 5NU that provides me with 25 Mbps 1080p AVCHD 8 bit 4:2:0 from the camera or 10 bit uncompressed 1080i 4:2:2 via SDI or HDMI. The latter would involve a MacBook (not lugging a 45 pound Mac Pro around on the set) and an external MOTU HD Express HDMI or or a Matrox O2 LE.
The key question is if the extra information is significant in terms of final look, constructing quality masks, etc. I believe the answer is yes as it relates to simply comparing 8 bit 4:2:0 versus 10 bit uncompressed 4:2:2. Seems the answer is murkier with the trade-off of 1080i (the uncompressed signal) versus 1080p from AVCHD.
I do not know the internal workings of the camera, it is possible that it is 1080i off of the sensor electronics and a pull down is happening with the avchd encoder which means that it is not really a trade-off.
Any opinions?
Otherwise I just focus on getting the best out of my camcorder’s avchd output using a waveform monitor and go for a Mac Pro in Post.
Any thoughts on this?
Wayne
PortlandWorth the effort? 8 bit AVCHD 1080p 4:2:0 versus 1080i 10 bit uncompressed 4:2:2
