Activity › Forums › Adobe After Effects › Workaround for QuickTime Renders in AE CC 2018?
-
Workaround for QuickTime Renders in AE CC 2018?
Posted by Ron Moore on September 24, 2018 at 7:45 pmWe’re not pleased with Adobe’s phasing out of QuickTime codec’s, apparently because of vulnerabilities. I can no longer render out a .mov video from After Effects using the Animation codec and save an alpha. Media Encoder is not much help either. I was able to render an uncompressed PNG sequence and arrive at an alpha channel that way, but AE and Media Encoder won’t even open up a rendered .mov from Cinema 4D R17, so this update does not seem to be “progress” to me. Any suggestions on alternative high-quality codecs in the latest version of After Effects?
Walter Soyka replied 7 years, 2 months ago 7 Members · 30 Replies -
30 Replies
-
Max Haller
September 24, 2018 at 8:40 pmHey Ron,
I’m using ae 15.1.0 ( I think the most current) and I can render animation codec with alpha without any trouble. What happens when you try? Is the option gone for you?
https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/quicktime7-support-dropped.html
I think that means you should still have access to rendering as an animation with alpha. You might have better luck exporting an image sequence from C4d and then importing the img sequence in AE instead of going straight to a video from C4d. Maybe I’m not on the most current build but I’ll just never update since everything works right for me! Good luck!
-
Ron Moore
September 24, 2018 at 8:52 pmThat’s right, Max, the option is no longer available. The codec list is not as extensive as the 2017 version of AE and I’m of the same mind as you in that I’m very cautious about upgrading. If it works I tend to leave it alone. Adobe updates at a frantic pace, so I try to keep at least one or two older versions of AE, Photoshop, Illustrator, and Premiere Pro since I know I can depend on them. The most upsetting to my workflow is not to be able to import .mov files into AE, at least that’s the limitation I’ve seen happen more often than not in this latest version.
-
Max Haller
September 24, 2018 at 9:24 pmActually I’m running CC 2018 here but I still have the animation codec. Not sure if this really viable since it’ll be a huge file, but would lossless with alpha work for what you need?
-
Ron Moore
September 24, 2018 at 9:42 pmSorry, I’m not in my home studio right now, but at the full-time job in radio production and I was in error about the Animation codec. That I do have but many of the other options for .mov files like Photo-JPEG are what’s missing, and they are indeed enormous files if you are forced to go with Animation for every QuickTime render. If AE could somehow open those .mov renders out of Cinema 4D, that would make things much easier.
-
Walter Soyka
September 25, 2018 at 12:34 amAdobe is dropping QuickTime support via Apple’s QuickTime library, because Apple has deprecated QuickTime on both Windows and macOS. In fact, the old 32-bit QuickTime library/codecs will not run at all on future versions of macOS (which will only run 64-bit applications).
Adobe has written their own support (via their MediaCore media handling framework) for the QuickTime movie format itself, as well as a selection of codecs. As Max notes, Animation is among them — but as you note, Animation codec files can get really big.
If you’re looking for a cross-platform, lightly-compressed, visually-lossless format that enjoys native support in Adobe apps, I’d suggest GoPro CineForm or Avid DNxHD/DNxHR.
Personally, though, for C4D renders, I stick to image sequences. If you’re used to using QuickTime PhotoJPEG, you could consider a JPEG sequence as an alternative.
Walter Soyka
Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
@keenlive | RenderBreak [blog] | Profile [LinkedIn] -
Andrew Somers
September 25, 2018 at 2:32 amI agree Walter,
I have always hated the Animation codec. Uncompressed 8 bit is lower fidelity than a 10 bit compressed format like ProRes. If you need an alpha channel, ProRes 4444 is superior to the animation codec and uses less space.
I think people like the sound of “uncompressed” — and it “was” actually important back in the days of tape to tape editing, where generation loss was a real concern. It’s not so much an issue with modern workflows.
Here’s a test I just ran of three codecs that support alphas, using a little test sequence with alpha. All outputs were with alpha and set to trillions of colors (except EXR which was Float of course):
12 bit ProRes 4444 is like a THIRD the file size, yet is superior in terms of dynamic range due to the higher bit depth. My favorite choice is EXR with Piz compression, 16 bit floating point and just a little bigger than the animation codec, but superior dynamic range. EXR is what I *always* use rendering out of C4D.
Andrew Somers
VFX & Title Supervisor
https://www.GeneralTitles.com -
Ron Moore
September 25, 2018 at 4:57 amThanks to all who replied and set me straight on the limitations of the Animation codec and benefits of the alternatives. I can definitely say I’ve learned something today!
-
Walter Soyka
September 25, 2018 at 9:31 am[Andrew Somers] “I have always hated the Animation codec. Uncompressed 8 bit is lower fidelity than a 10 bit compressed format like ProRes. “
Well… it’s worth noting that Animation can be encoded on any platform, and that depending on what you’re doing, an 8-bit RGB intermediate could be superior to a chroma-subsampled Y’CbCr intermediate like ProRes 422, even though it is 10-bit.
I strongly agree on rendering EXR out of C4D — we do the same as a matter of course. You get so much more flexibility in compositing with all that dynamic range conserved in a floating point format.
Walter Soyka
Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
@keenlive | RenderBreak [blog] | Profile [LinkedIn] -
Andrew Somers
September 25, 2018 at 2:48 pmWalter said: Well… it’s worth noting that Animation can be encoded on any platform, and that depending on what you’re doing, an 8-bit RGB intermediate could be superior to a chroma-subsampled Y’CbCr intermediate like ProRes 422, even though it is 10-bit.
Yes, I agree, certainly a color key would be less desirable with a 422 format, but I was thinking more along the lines of ProRes4444 though I see I wasn’t totally clear. And of course I tend to forget the incomplete support for ProRes on windows. Avid’s DNx formats tend to have some weird artifacts that I like to stay away from.
I did have a client once that had problems using ProRes or DNx, and needed the Animation codec with alpha just to make things easier for them.
Andrew Somers
VFX & Title Supervisor
https://www.GeneralTitles.com -
Steve Bentley
September 26, 2018 at 3:39 amAs for some AE 2018 versions still supporting codecs like Animation: version <=15.03 (of 2018) still supports Qt but as soon as you let CC upgrade you to the 15.1 or higher, you’re done. Yes there are some bug fixes in 15.1x but you have to decide how bad you want that RLE codecvs the bug fixes. Without ProRes available on the PC, we too miss this clean small mb format (mostly for mattes).
Many of our AE outputs on PC have to travel to a client’s Mac to be encoded to ProRes and are massive enough even in Animation best so using EXRs would be out of the question. I’m not a fan of the Avid one but I hadn’t thought of the Cineform one. We’ll give that whirl.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up
