Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe Premiere Pro Why is there a thin black stroke around .png images in Premiere / Encoder exported videos?

  • Why is there a thin black stroke around .png images in Premiere / Encoder exported videos?

    Posted by Eric Mccarthy on June 27, 2013 at 4:29 pm

    I have a thin grey stroke that is showing up around all the image .pngs in my output files. The stroke doesn’t show up when the video is viewed in Premiere. I am using .png files to cover specific parts of the video track, and I want them to blend into the background (it is a screen capture with some info that needs to be covered up).

    I cross posted this on an existing thread in the Adobe Community forum. Someone else has the same issue. Here is a link to that forum, which includes screen shots:

    https://forums.adobe.com/message/5427456

    Any help would be great.

    Thanks in advance.

    -Eric

    Chris Borjis replied 13 years, 2 months ago 3 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Ivan Myles

    June 27, 2013 at 6:51 pm

    Try trimming the edges with the Crop effect.

  • Eric Mccarthy

    June 27, 2013 at 7:09 pm

    Okay, I am going to try this and send an export to the Queue. Will let you know what happens.

  • Ivan Myles

    June 27, 2013 at 7:18 pm

    I recommend using a direct export from Premiere instead of the AME queue.

  • Eric Mccarthy

    June 27, 2013 at 8:17 pm

    I used the Crop Tool on the PSD file before exporting a .png, then replaced the .png in the Premiere timeline, and viola! It worked. Not sure why… but I will take it!

    I encoded using AME and it still did okay, just out of curiosity, why did you recommend against AME? I use this all the time…

    You can see a more detailed discussion of this issue (border around .pngs) on this thread at Adobe Communities.

    https://forums.adobe.com/message/5456455#5456455

  • Ivan Myles

    June 27, 2013 at 8:26 pm

    [Eric McCarthy] “just out of curiosity, why did you recommend against AME? I use this all the time…”

    It helps with troubleshooting to eliminate potential contributing factors. In addition, if the output is being rescaled upon export then sending a job to the AME queue can degrade image quality, as discussed in this post.

  • Chris Borjis

    June 27, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    also sending it to que typically adds A LOT more export time.

    I had a video that exported directly out of premiere took 15 minutes.
    that same sequence exported through the queuing in ame wanted an hour!

  • Ivan Myles

    June 27, 2013 at 9:26 pm

    Sometimes the queue is slower and sometimes it is faster. In a test of 40 rendering jobs it was 30 seconds slower on average. When transcoding from a master file the queue was 2.4 minutes slower per file. The main advantages are background processing and the ability to queue multiple jobs in succession.

  • Eric Mccarthy

    June 27, 2013 at 9:55 pm

    Thanks guys,

    I am always ping-pong-ing back and forth between projects, so I have to use the AME to keep Premiere open for work. Sometimes, if I am also doing AE work I will set the AME up on a separate machine (accessing the timelines from our RAID), but I am usually more concerned with the processor hit to the current program working than to the encoding process in the BG… Still good info to be aware of.

    -Eric

  • Chris Borjis

    June 27, 2013 at 10:53 pm

    I hear that.

    If I have a bunch of sequences to get exported and have time or
    running overnight I do que them.

    Exporting H.264 takes WAY longer though compared to codecs like ProRes
    via que in my experience.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy