Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Why does my footage look so poor in FCP BUT NOT AE?

  • Why does my footage look so poor in FCP BUT NOT AE?

    Posted by Diego Garcia on November 19, 2008 at 4:05 am

    Hello,

    This is my first post. This is something that has been bothering me for a long time now. I shot an interview on the HVX200. This is the info I have of the footage: 720 x 480 (1.20) , Seperating lower
    – 23.976 fps 3:2 Removal – dv/dvcpro ntsc

    I dont understand why my footage looks terrible on FCP but then I threw the video from my capture scratch into After Effects and it looks so clean and great. The way I want it to look!

    I dont understand why this is? I’m assuming it’s a interlace issue but I’m not even sure if the video is interlace or progressive so thats something I need to figure out as well. Below are some screen captures I took to help you understand my problem. You can really see the difference of quality in the edges of his arm!!!

    Please help me figure this out! Ideally I want to edit this on FCP at the highest quality the way it looks on the After Effects!

    Crappy FCP: https://i37.tinypic.com/14nmjyq.png
    Sweet AE: https://i35.tinypic.com/2e2qr1z.png
    Even worse quicktime from the capture scratch: https://i36.tinypic.com/2cohims.png

    Cheers! and thanks!
    Diego

    Jeremy Garchow replied 17 years, 9 months ago 7 Members · 14 Replies
  • 14 Replies
  • Zane Barker

    November 19, 2008 at 6:23 am

    What is your video p;ay back quality set at in FCP?

    There are no “technical solutions” to your “artistic problems”.
    Don’t let technology get in the way of your creativity!

  • Don Greening

    November 19, 2008 at 6:38 am

    Hi Diego,

    Welcome to Creative COW.

    The fact that you’re editing in a 23.976 timeline leads me to believe that your footage is progressive (24p) and not interlaced. If your sequence settings are DV NTSC Anamorphic the default field dominance setting for the sequence will, however, be interlaced. Go to the Browser and in the field dominance column for the sequence it’s most likely set to “lower”. Right or control-click in the column and choose “none” from the pop-up menu. If you already have down-converted-from-HD progressive clips in that sequence you’ll have to make sure that all their field dominance settings are set to “none” as well. Changing the field dominance setting for the sequence alone will not clean things up unless all the clips within the sequence also are flagged as progressive. Just assume that anything imported into a DV NTSC project will default to interlaced and that you have to check everything and change to a field dominance setting of “none” as part of your workflow.

    See that cleans everything up in FCP.

    – Don

  • David Roth weiss

    November 19, 2008 at 6:58 am

    Diego,

    Your screenshot from FCP shows clearly that the canvas is sized to 123%. You need to size the canvas at exactly 100% to see your footage properly.

    As far as the QT Player, go to Window>>Show Movie Properties>>Video Track>>Visual Settings and make certain to check the “High Quality” box.

    Also, your aspect ratio in QT Player is displaying improperly, and to fix that you need to go to Window>>Show Movie Properties>>clip name>>Presentation and check the box “conform aperture to, and select “clean,” which should properly display the aspect ratio.

    In addition, go to Quicktime Player>>Preferences and check t ebox all th eway down at the bottom that says, “Enable Final Cut Studio color compatibility.”

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.

  • Rafael Amador

    November 19, 2008 at 2:57 pm

    And just to add something to the advice of Zane, Don and David, with AE you can easily check if your footage is Progressive or Interlaced.
    Set to “fields increment” so the play head will step field by field instead of frame by frame. If you see that every to steps you get the same picture, then is Progresive.
    Rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 19, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    I would also like to add, that according to your picture Diego, you HAVE to win an award for youngest FCP user.

    Ever.

  • Rafael Amador

    November 19, 2008 at 5:47 pm

    Yeah, I vote for Diego too:-)

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Don Greening

    November 19, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    Keeping this thread on topic then, I have to point out that I’ve never seen you looking so…….young, Jeremy.

    – Don

  • Diego Garcia

    November 19, 2008 at 8:29 pm

    Haha! Thanks my niece! Her face is way cuter than my mug!

    Thanks for your helpful replies everyone. Okay so setting the canvas window to 100% in FCP solved that! Thanks David. Also on quicktime checking the “high quality box” fixed my problem with QT. The only thing that was strange was that the “conform aperture to, and select “clean”, was already checked and selected.

    How can I tell if the footage is interlaced or progressive? Rafael where can I set that fields increment in AE? Is there a way to check/analyze the footage in FCP? I’m guessing it is interlaced since I’m getting window blinds effects when my subject’s hands moves around when he’s speaking.

    Sincere thanks to everyone who has taken their time to respond!
    Cheers!
    Diego

  • Rafael Amador

    November 20, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    [Diego Garcia] “where can I set that fields increment in AE”
    Hi Diego,
    Sorry I can not help you about this. I’m still working with AE 6.5 (no money to upgrade) and this function it doesn’t exist in this version. I think is available from AE 7 on.
    FC have an “Analyze” function (Tools) but won’t helps you to determine the correct field order.
    Rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 20, 2008 at 3:39 pm

    [Don Greening] “I have to point out that I’ve never seen you looking so…….young, Jeremy.”

    Thanks? I guess?

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy