Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Why do users say FCP X is fast? Some new numbers.
-
Why do users say FCP X is fast? Some new numbers.
Neil Goodman replied 10 years, 11 months ago 24 Members · 89 Replies
-
Robin S. kurz
August 23, 2015 at 6:29 am[Tom Sefton] “You might not want to believe me,”
I never said anything about believing you. I merely stated that I have contrary experiences. YMMV. No one NLE is everything to everybody and never will be.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
Scott Witthaus
August 23, 2015 at 12:21 pm[Tom Sefton] “However, with high res raw footage it just hasn’t performed as well for us as premiere has. It slows down.”
It’s funny. I had the exact experience in a Premiere job (CS6). Cutting a bunch of Epic 5k and Premiere could not keep up with me. I would move around the timeline and get these “accessing media” dialogue (something like that. It was a while ago). Frustrating. Running Premiere with that footage, it always felt like a big crash was coming. I hit command-S after every change I made just to be sure. A thoroughly underwhelming experience.
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter -
Oliver Peters
August 23, 2015 at 1:04 pm[Scott Witthaus] “I had the exact experience in a Premiere job (CS6).”
I don’t doubt that, but you do realize that CS6 is pretty ancient by current standards. CC2015 is a significantly improved tool with improved performance. Making comparisons to CS6 is like making comparisons to FCP X 10.0 or FCP 7.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
Eric Santiago
August 23, 2015 at 1:56 pmJust to add my 3 cents (Canadian currency sucks), at home I work entirely on all three NLEs and to date still find RED files to be smoothest on FCPX.
Ive had to test an 1100+ R3D clip feature for the Director (slash Editor…kill me now 😛 )to see which would be best for him since he’s attempting a rough to final cut on an 2012 iMac.
In the end he opted to go with Premiere since he was comfortable in it.
I however found FCPX almost painless across the board.
R3D and FCPX has always been the best combo I find as far as minimal CPU resources. -
Dennis Radeke
August 24, 2015 at 11:27 amThank you Oliver from preventing me from making a snarky response, while on vacation no less!
Everyone here has their biases, and that’s honestly some of the particular flavor that makes this forum so interesting. In fairness and candor, I put mine clearly in my signature. Others might consider something similar.
Dennis – Adobe guy
-
Tony West
August 24, 2015 at 3:26 pm“Everyone here has their biases, and that’s honestly some of the particular flavor that makes this forum so interesting. In fairness and candor, I put mine clearly in my signature. Others might consider something similar.”
You are an “employee” of Adobe correct Dennis?
I think an employee should state that.
I also think there is a difference between an employee and a satisfied customer. One of those has the ultimate bias.
I appreciate your input on these topics though ; )
-
Jim Wiseman
August 24, 2015 at 5:16 pmToo bad Premiere CS6 was the last version to not require perpetual rental with your projects going “poof” when you quit paying. Otherwise keep forking it over to Mr. Burn the Boats like some hypnotized lemming. Won’t be getting to try that CC 2015 experiment.
I work for myself, a corporation of one. Fortunately, I get to make my own decisions for this company. Prejudice clearly stated.
Jim Wiseman
Sony PMW-EX1, Pana AJ-D810 DVCPro, DVX-100, Nikon D7000, Final Cut Pro X 10.2.1, Final Cut Studio 2 and 3, Media 100 Suite 2.1.6, Premiere Pro CS 5.5 and 6.0, AJA ioHD, AJA Kona LHi, Blackmagic Ultrastudio 4K, Blackmagic Teranex, Avid MC, 2013 Mac Pro Hexacore, 1TB SSD, 64GB RAM, 2-D500, Helios 2 w 2-960GB SSDs: 2012 Hexacore MacPro 3.33 Ghz, 24Gb RAM, GTX-680, 960GB SSD: Macbook Pro 17″ 2011 2.2 Ghz Quadcore i7 16GB RAM 250GB SSD, Multiple OWC Thunderbay 4 TB2 and eSATA QX2 RAID 5 HD systems -
Michael Gissing
August 24, 2015 at 11:03 pm[Steve Connor] So us CC subscribers are “hypnotised lemmings”? – nice!
As program makers we should be acutely aware of the manipulation of lemmings in the classic Disney film “White Wilderness” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Wilderness_%28film%29)
If lemmings could be hypnotised they might do something suicidal but I dare say it is far easier to hypnotise humans. That said, I do not agree that a subscription model is suicidal and that it is perfectly fine for many.
Perfect for all? Of course not. No software or payment model is. Adobe software has been historically hugely cracked and pirated and without control of OS and online stores they really did have to look at a different model.
-
Scott Witthaus
August 25, 2015 at 10:04 am[Michael Gissing] “they really did have to look at a different model.
“When do you think the first price increases will be, if that has not happened already?
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up