Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations What is part of your Final Cut Studio?

  • What is part of your Final Cut Studio?

    Posted by David Mathis on January 1, 2015 at 12:21 am

    Not so much of the hardware side of the equation but mainly plug-ins, core software and utilities.

    Mine includes:
    FCP X
    Motion 5
    Compressor 4
    Resolve 11 (most current version)
    Media Info
    Red Giant Universe

    Waiting for Fusion

    Oliver Peters replied 11 years, 4 months ago 6 Members · 10 Replies
  • 10 Replies
  • Michael Gissing

    January 1, 2015 at 2:45 am

    FCP Legend Suite with various plugins (Nattress, FX Factory, Colorista 11) – Motion, Color, Compressor etc. Automatic Duck. MacPro late 2009, largely retired

    WIN7 PC (i7 6 core, 64 gig RAM, NVIDIA 680 graphics) Adobe CS6, Resolve 11 (latest), Tangent Wave, Fairlight Xynergi (second one). Resolve has Boris Continuum 9, Red Giant Universe & Digital Anarchy Flicker Free. Fusion lite. Open DCP, MacDrive & Linux disk mount/write software.

    WIN7 PC Fairlight Xynergi (Main sound post room) with iZotope RX4 Advanced & Voxengo plugins. Sir2 convolution reverbs. Lots of other VST plugins.

    Linux Mint – office laptop with various utilities for AV work.

    On the wait list is a UHD OLED monitor & Titan 2 NVIDIA card ( both due around April 2015).

    For field work Blackmagic 4k Camera, Canon 5D mk2, 16-35 & 70-200 Lenses & 2x Canon doubler. Sound Devices 788t multichannel recorder, Schoeps microphones & Holophone surround ambient microphone. Heavy duty Manfrotto fluid head tripod, Various LED lights.

  • David Mathis

    January 1, 2015 at 2:59 am

    Blackmagic Cinema Camera and soon to get Rokinon lens. By the way, how easy is it to learn Mint? Also, is it more like Windows or Mac OS X? Been thinking about going over to Linux for Resolve, might get better playback but not sure. Any advice is greatly appreciated.

  • Michael Gissing

    January 1, 2015 at 3:37 am

    David,

    Mint is just as easy as WIN7 or OSX. Most operating systems are easy to drive in my experience until you need to get into scripting/ programming or command line.

    Mint lets you find & install software without ever needing to go to the command line. I would recommend Resolve on Windows. Simply because drivers for graphics cards will be more up to date and you can also jump straight into Fusion. Adobe CC is also available if and when you need it on WIN. Add MacDrive software to WIN and you can read write HFS drives at full speed.

    Mint is like a toolbox on a laptop for me. I do not intend to run Resolve on it. I do however run some old WIN3, WINXP and even DOS programs with it using WINE. It is the front end to the internet for hacking & virus security. All the WIN machines are off the web so all software downloads are done via the Linux machine. Everything is networked but Linux acts as the gateway to the outside world.

  • Oliver Peters

    January 1, 2015 at 4:02 am

    For working with X, all the utilities are useful

    Xto7
    7toX
    X2Pro
    EDL-X
    ClipExporter2
    Sync-N-Link X

    For file conversions/processing

    MPEG Streamclip
    EditReady
    Catalyst Prepare
    Cinema Tools
    QT 7
    QtChange
    Better Rename
    Compressor
    Resolve

    For audio processing/mixing/mastering

    Logic Pro X
    Soundforge 2 for Mac
    RX4 Advanced
    Nectar 2

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • David Mathis

    January 1, 2015 at 4:17 am

    Oliver,

    Is it possible to use Resolve in place of X to 7 or not?

  • Oliver Peters

    January 1, 2015 at 3:05 pm

    [David Mathis] “Is it possible to use Resolve in place of X to 7 or not?”

    Sometimes. I have found all the various FCPXML-to-whatever translations to vary slightly. You don’t get the same results from one to the next. Most of the time Xto7 and/or 7toX are more accurate than Resolve.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • Mitch Ives

    January 1, 2015 at 4:54 pm

    [Oliver Peters] “Most of the time Xto7 and/or 7toX are more accurate than Resolve.”

    +1

    Just purchased 7toX to migrate an old project over. Worked very well… better than I expected actually,,,

    Mitch Ives
    Insight Productions Corp.

    “Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill

  • Helge Tjelta

    January 1, 2015 at 7:14 pm

    FCPX
    Resolve
    Fusion

    Apple Motion
    Pixelmator, iDraw

    7toX
    X2Pro

    Adobe AE, PS, IS
    MPEG Streamclip
    Cinema Tools
    QT 7
    Compressor

    For audio processing/mixing/mastering
    Nuendo (superb for videowork, from steinberg)

  • Herb Sevush

    January 2, 2015 at 2:41 pm

    Oliver –

    Have you tried the new EQ and Ambience matching features of RX4 yet?
    The price for the advanced version is a little steep for me but I am definitely intrigued by some of its features. I already have the denoiser as part of Soundforge and love the quality and ease of use, just wondering about your decision to go for the advanced version.

    Herb Sevush
    Zebra Productions
    —————————
    nothin’ attached to nothin’
    “Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf

  • Oliver Peters

    January 2, 2015 at 11:21 pm

    [Herb Sevush] “Have you tried the new EQ and Ambience matching features of RX4 yet?”

    I haven’t used it extensively, other than to test it.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy