Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Westmere or Nehalem best for FCP?

  • Westmere or Nehalem best for FCP?

    Posted by Kyler Boudreau on December 14, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    I can either purchase the Nehalem 2.93GHz Quad Xeon, a 3.33GHz Six Core Westmere or a system configured with 2 Six Core Westmeres….they are really all about the same price. Maybe $500-$1000 in difference.

    Are there any advantages with FCP and Compresor with any specific processor? My guess is the single 3.33 six core will be screaming fast. I know the Westmere processors have more cache (12mb vs. 8mb).

    Anyway, anyone have any input I’d be grateful.

    Also, anyone using a RAID card in their MAC besides the one Apple offers? I’m looking for something better than Apple is putting in and probably doubling the price on. =)

    _______________________
    kyler boudreau
    http://www.theatereleven.com
    ph.310.425.2231

    Kyler Boudreau replied 15 years, 4 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Chris Borjis

    December 15, 2010 at 12:37 am

    not for fcp but definitely compressor. more cores the better. get at least 2gb of ram per core for best performance.

    for RAID I use the caldigit with their array tower.

  • Joe Paolo

    December 15, 2010 at 5:06 am

    Check out https://www.barefeats.com/

    I remember the 6 core doing very well.

    joe
    editmojo.com

  • Kyler Boudreau

    December 28, 2010 at 3:11 am

    That was a great resource – thanks for the link. I purchased the 3.33GHz single six-core processor system as that seemed to be the most bang for the buck. Like it so far!

    _______________________
    kyler boudreau
    http://www.theatereleven.com
    ph.310.425.2231

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy