-
Well – it’s “early” 2012
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “gary adcock] “The update landed this am ”
*grin*
“If they have added stability improvements as well, then you might be able to start using it on paying jobs Jeremy?
Steve Connor
“FCPX Agitator”
Adrenalin Television -
[Steve Connor] “If they have added stability improvements as well, then you might be able to start using it on paying jobs Jeremy?”
I don’t want to get my hopes up, but….
Again, I am unofficially, with a doubt, not excited about this at all.
Why should I be? 😉
Jeremy
-
[tony west] “[Mark Morache] “I’ve suspected that they don’t have round tripping because motion has tracks, and FCX doesn’t.”
I think you might have nailed this Mark.”
Motion has tracks? I would say it has groups or containers (like another Apple program we talk about here). It doesn’t have a V1 A1A2 structure at all.
My guess is that the motion project structure and the FCPX project structure don’t jive quite yet. I except this will change, eventually.
I must have missed this mention, but Compressor and Motion got point updates as well today.
Where’s Herb Sevush? Wonder what he thinks about the 64 camera angle mutlicam.
Jeremy
-
[Andrew Richards] “I’ve got my monopoly money on late March to permit any cooperative third parties like AJA or Blackmagic show their wares with it at NAB.”
Looks like I laid down my Monopoly money about 12 hours too soon! This is why I don’t gamble when I go to NAB…
Best,
Andy -
[Aindreas Gallagher] “there are no magical updates”
Oh yes there are!
Steve Connor
“FCPX Agitator”
Adrenalin Television
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up