Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations The Real Menace of FCP X

  • Neil Goodman

    May 26, 2018 at 4:03 pm

    [Scott Witthaus] “You are looking at speed in terms of a race. That’s not correct. What speed does is allow time for more creative options to be tried. In the advertising world, I never found NLE’s made the rough cut phase shorter. Agencies still pushed to limit to air-date as they did in the linear days. What the “speedy NLE” did, however was allow us to try more ideas and versions. So they still booked the same amount of “Avid time” as they always had in pre-Avid days but we just got to try more things because of “speed”. In my mind, the inspiration comes out of the work. You don’t sit there with your feet up on the console waiting for the great idea to hit you like a bolt of lightening. You get material on the timeline and start crafting. The more efficiently you can do that, the better. If that’s speed, that’s better.”

    Sure – but a-lot of threads on here are about I can do this operation this much faster with this many less key strokes. That part of “speed” is the one I dont care about. If your bragging about shaving seconds or even milliseconds of an editing operation than our goals as editors are very different.

  • Scott Witthaus

    May 26, 2018 at 4:08 pm

    “If your bragging about shaving seconds or even milliseconds of an editing operation than our goals as editors are very different.”

    That speed is good only if the accumulation of time savings allows you to do more creative editorial for your client. My goal is to give my client the best possible product they can get. If the time savings allows me to try a few more options for them, then yes, it is important.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Visual Storyteller
    https://vimeo.com/channels/1322525
    Managing Partner, Low Country Creative LLC
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    May 26, 2018 at 4:26 pm

    Hmmm, looks like a couple of folks here might be on the Adobe “dime”? One thread after another on the “mencace” of X….hmmmmm

    Just saying (totally kidding of course. Adobe uses third party emissaries to pay…).

    😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Visual Storyteller
    https://vimeo.com/channels/1322525
    Managing Partner, Low Country Creative LLC
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Oliver Peters

    May 26, 2018 at 5:05 pm

    [Scott Witthaus] “Just saying (totally kidding of course. Adobe uses third party emissaries to pay…).”

    Speaking of insulting.

    Oliver

    Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com

  • Scott Witthaus

    May 26, 2018 at 5:14 pm

    I was kidding….geeez….

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Visual Storyteller
    https://vimeo.com/channels/1322525
    Managing Partner, Low Country Creative LLC
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Brett Sherman

    May 27, 2018 at 1:41 pm

    [Simon Ubsdell]
    I’m just going to knock this piece of ad hominem nonsense on the head once and for all and then leave. I was here enthusing about FCP X before most of you showed up – within days if not hours of the launch to be exact.

    While that may be true. I think that is largely irrelevant.

    [Simon Ubsdell] “I do not believe I have ever been dismissive of FCP X nor do I have the intention of ever being dismissive of it now or in the future. I will continue to use it and enjoy using it for as long as it’s still around. And I will reserve the right to be as critical of it as I would be of any other piece of software.”

    No one is saying that there should be no criticism of FCP X. But I think if this is what you’re trying to communicate, you need to revisit your tone. You are not coming across that way. Saying you’re with Andreas, who( regardless of the entertainment factor) is clearly dismissive of FCP X – well that actually communicates something. And what actual specific criticism is in this post? I don’t see any specifics. Look, we’ve all had our rants. But by and large rants are not positive interactions. And do little to further good discussion.

  • James Culbertson

    May 29, 2018 at 4:57 pm

    MEGA – Make Editing Great Again!

    [Personally, I keep coming back to this forum for the entertainment. …just when I think threads can’t get any more silly, they do.]

    Anyway, back to my serfdom.

  • Scott Witthaus

    May 29, 2018 at 6:12 pm

    [James Culbertson] “.just when I think threads can’t get any more silly, they do”

    Exactly!

    Did you hear that FCPX is the main cause of global warming?

    😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Visual Storyteller
    https://vimeo.com/channels/1322525
    Managing Partner, Low Country Creative LLC
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Jeremy Garchow

    May 30, 2018 at 12:29 am

    Simon-

    I hope you don’t leave for good. Your contributions to both discussions on this forum, and to the greater FCPX ecosystem are great.

    I hope to see you in future threads.

  • David Mathis

    May 30, 2018 at 4:37 am

    I hope Simon will stay as well. I may not agree completely with his opinions in his original post in this thead but I respect both his opinions and him. A healthy debate is always good. Simon, please continue to contribute here!

Page 4 of 5

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy