-
Text & render clips show “hot pink” instead of transparency (black)
To avoid confusion in what I describe below, when I write RENDER CLIP, I mean the various “render” clips available in FCP7 via the drop down menu in the viewer, e.g., clouds, gradients, etc.
In one of my sequences, for an end credit, I stacked in the timeline a text clip on top of a render clip. The render clip was cropped down to a horizontal line, say about 1/3rd of the frame; and the text lived in that 1/3rd. The rest of the frame I let go transparent (black). Imagine one stripe on a black flag, with text in the stripe, and you’ve got the idea.
I sent this to Compressor to make an MPEG-2. In the finished transcoded file, in this end credit where there ought to have been black (transparency), instead, from time to time, the color “pink” would appear. (or some sort of vibrant magenta).
I did a work around by exporting the troublesome end title (in the sequence codec) to QuickTime. I imported the QT movie back into the FCP project, and used it to replace the 2 clips I’d originally generated to construct the end title (the text clip and the render clip). So I got the job done, but I’m still wondering what the heck happened that caused me to lose black behind my text (transparency) and end up with it going “pink”?
Now I’ve I got a variation on the same problem. I sent 4 sequences to Compressor to make MPEG-2’s today. The sequences were from 4 different projects. In each sequence, I had dropped a simple text clip (each text clip generated new from within each different project) at the head of each timeline.
Three sequences transcoded without problem. But in one of my sequences, once again the notorious pink appears “behind” the text, instead of the black (transparency).
Anyone run into this “pink” problem before?
There is a second inter-related part to my question.
I read in the forum FAQ that you recommend exporting to QT, and then dropping that file into Compressor. I guess I don’t have to tell you that its a point of disagreement between experts, as to whether or not to (a) do a send to Compressor, or (b) export to QT and then take the exported file to Compressor. I note that Ripple Training and moderators on 2-POP have both extolled “send” for highest quality results. But I also remember reading (some years ago) experts bemoaning the unreliability of the “send” function in various versions of FCP past. With these opposing views, both from reliable experts, I wonder what the current state of opinion is among FCP7-using Cow forum members?
Is your experience that “send” gives you substantially higher quality encodes?
Is your experience that “send” is “unstable” and is a wild card in terms of results?
Thanks in advance
