Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Tape Backup LTO or DLT?

  • Tape Backup LTO or DLT?

    Posted by Don Walker on September 30, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    Every hard drive attached to my computer is over 90% full! I would like to avoid buying more hard drives.
    Can anybody recommend a good tape based solution for a 1 or 2 editing station operation. Are there any solutions that don’t require SCSI cards?
    I have done some research, but still kind of confused.
    Don Walker

    John 3:16

    Jason Brown replied 15 years, 7 months ago 4 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Jeremy Garchow

    September 30, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    LTO and Cache-A.

    https://cache-a.com/

    All you need is an ethernet connection.

    Jeremy

  • Don Walker

    September 30, 2010 at 5:32 pm

    Thanks Jeremy.
    I did a bad Creative Cow thing….. I searched the web. (for the last couple of months) posted my post. Then searched the Cow.
    BEFORE MAKING A POST-SEARCH THE COW FIRST!…… I knew this, but sinned anyway. Found the Cache-A sight. That looks like what I need.
    Thanks for your help.
    1.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    2.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    3.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    4.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    5.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    6.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    7.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    8.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    9.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    10.BEFORE MAKING A POST, I WILL SEARCH THE COW FIRST
    don walker
    Texarkana, Texas

    John 3:16

  • Carsten Orlt

    September 30, 2010 at 10:44 pm

    and if you want to save a lot of money compared to Cache-A
    HP LTO-4 + Atto H380 + BruPE

    Carsten

  • Jeremy Garchow

    September 30, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    My bet is that it’s not ethernet enabled, does not have a hard drive in it for fast transfers, does not accept p2 or other media as direct attach archive, does not have a built in searchable database like the Cache-A, does require 3rd party archive software and does require you to have a computer with am available PCIe slot?

    There’s a reason the Cache-A is more money, it’s geared toward video professionals and archiving.

    Jeremy

  • Carsten Orlt

    October 1, 2010 at 12:00 am

    always love (and it seems to be getting the norm) when the post include ‘because it’s made for professionals’ implying whatever I suggested was amateurish stuff.

    I know all the bits about the Cache-A system but if I can save about $6000 (last time I checked, might have changed) and still get professional archiving of my media/data I sure pay attention.

    But hey I’m just an amateur . . .

    Carsten

  • Jeremy Garchow

    October 1, 2010 at 12:27 am

    Whoa, whoa. Did I call you an amateur? Was any of my post even directed to you personally? Sorry if you took it that way.

    What I’m saying is, the cache-a system is setup for people. Like us.

    I don’t have the ProCache, I have the Prime Cache. The whole thing is about 6 grand so unless the HP is free or close to it saving 6 grand seems extreme. It’s self contained and plug and play. Just weighing the options is all. The Cache-A systems are super easy to use and ready for video. That’s all.

  • Jason Brown

    October 1, 2010 at 2:00 pm

    Did I just hear someone say “free LTO backup” 🙂

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy