Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Switched…then switched back?
-
Franz Bieberkopf
August 1, 2014 at 2:14 am[Charlie Austin] “I was actually referring to editing/mixing the actual music”
Charlie,
So was I.
Franz.
-
Franz Bieberkopf
August 1, 2014 at 2:15 am[Charlie Austin] “I rarely used it in FCP “classic”
Charlie,
To be clear, that was my suggestion …
Franz.
-
Charlie Austin
August 1, 2014 at 2:16 am[Franz Bieberkopf] “[Charlie Austin] “I was actually referring to editing/mixing the actual music”
Charlie,
So was I.
“Well then, clearly we are both correct. 😉
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Charlie Austin
August 1, 2014 at 2:17 am[Franz Bieberkopf] “[Charlie Austin] “I rarely used it in FCP “classic”
Charlie,
To be clear, that was my suggestion …
Franz.
“I get it, I just never liked it… faster to just stick to the timeline. Different strokes for different folks…
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Redefined Media
August 1, 2014 at 8:14 amI moved from 7 to x. It was hard to adjust to x at first but once i got the hang of it i realised how user friendly it was. I now use it all of the time and would highly recommend it to anyone who is thinking about jumping ship.
Redefined Media
-
Franz Bieberkopf
August 1, 2014 at 1:26 pmCharlie,
… to recap:
[Charlie Austin] ” … because the only alternative is key framing which is a PITA.”
[Franz Bieberkopf] “… try the mixer. It makes adjusting levels so intuitive and direct that you’ll forget you’re making keyframes.”
[Charlie Austin] “I’ve tried the mixer… I rarely used it in FCP “classic”.”
[Charlie Austin] “I just never liked it… faster to just stick to the timeline.”It’s a bit disingenuous to complain that you prefer your pain-in-the-ass method.
Isn’t the general chorus here that you don’t complain if you’re “not using it properly” or some such? Yes, here it is:
[Charlie Austin] “But saying something’s broken because it doesn’t work the way you want it to is… inaccurate. :-)”
Franz.
-
Charlie Austin
August 1, 2014 at 3:24 pm[Franz Bieberkopf] “Isn’t the general chorus here that you don’t complain if you’re “not using it properly” or some such? Yes, here it is:”
I’m not sure what you’re saying… All I’m saying is that I find that the audio tools in X work just fine. I find key framing and using a mixer to to be a PITA. I never said FCP 7 or Pr or anything was “broken”.
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Aindreas Gallagher
August 1, 2014 at 5:24 pmhey charlie, come on – we just can’t comprehend this future microwave you’re wielding. It’s you know, beyond our ken.
tee hee hee hee hee.
https://i.imgur.com/574uWB1.jpg
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Franz Bieberkopf
August 1, 2014 at 6:15 pm[Charlie Austin] “I’m not sure what you’re saying… All I’m saying is that I find that the audio tools in X work just fine. I find key framing and using a mixer to to be a PITA. I never said FCP 7 or Pr or anything was “broken”.”
Charlie,
I’m only saying that if you’d like a easier, faster, more responsive way to add keyframes, then that tool exists in FCP7. If you’re happy without it then you don’t need it of course, but calling keyframing audio levels in FCP7 a “pain-in-the-ass” ignores tools designed precisely to make such a thing easier.
Franz.
-
Richard Herd
August 1, 2014 at 7:10 pm[Charlie Austin] “[Franz Bieberkopf] “[Charlie Austin] “I was actually referring to editing/mixing the actual music”
Charlie,
So was I.
”Well then, clearly we are both correct. ;-)”
That was fun. So in a DAW, we can set the app to auto crossfade when two clips collide. Can X do that?
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up