Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Sony Vegas pro 9 Rendering very slow

  • Sony Vegas pro 9 Rendering very slow

    Posted by Nik Davis on June 28, 2009 at 11:04 pm

    Hey, I’m new to this community so bare with me.

    I was using Sony Vegas Pro 9 today to do a small intro video (15 seconds long). I added a few effects and one transition and some audio…

    So I finished up and I went to render the final video and it started rendering. This rendering process took around 8 minutes for a 15 second video compared to Sony Vegas pro 8 which would rendered the same thing in about 15-30 seconds…

    My computer has a quad core processor with 4G ram, 32 bit, and a very good graphics card. (I have the 32 bit version of Vegas Pro 9 by the way). So my computer should be rendering this 15 second video quickly like it did with pro 8.

    Does anyone else have this problem? Is this Sony Vegas with the problem or is it just me or my computer? Do I need to change some settings to get it to work properly?

    Please help me out. thanks…

    Guy Rocky replied 15 years, 11 months ago 6 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Mike Kujbida

    June 29, 2009 at 2:18 am

    What effects did you add?
    Certain ones (Magic Bullet, for example) are well known for long render times.

  • Nik Davis

    June 29, 2009 at 5:49 am

    I added the “Star Burst” effect.

    Yea, I see what you mean, that effect does look pretty demanding when I think about it. However, when I take off the effect and render it, it’s still not as fast as Pro 8 would render it. However I did notice a slight speed difference when I took it off to render. So I guess it’s mainly the effects itself.

    I’m wondering if you, or anyone else would know of a method to optimize Sony Vegas to get the best performance for rendering real time and the final project. Like maybe suggestions on freeing up even more space on my computer so Vegas can get the most out of my processing and/or memory.

    Tips on acquiring optimal real time rendering while editing would be greatly appreciated.

  • Mike Kujbida

    June 29, 2009 at 11:13 am

    Yes, Star Burst is a render time killer 🙁

    Here’s a tip I grabbed from the Sony Knowledgebase some time ago.
    Hope it helps.

    Close all background applications.
    This is not limited to the programs that show in the system tray.
    Do a ctrl+alt+del and end task or process on as many applications as you can.

    For Windows XP, you will only need next to your user name:

    explorer.exe
    taskmgr.exe

    Next to “system”:
    csrss.exe
    lsass.exe
    mspmspv.exe
    services.exe
    smss.exe
    spoolsv.exe
    svchost.exe
    system
    system idle process
    winlogon.exe

  • Nik Davis

    June 29, 2009 at 3:08 pm

    Alright thank you very much for your help. I really appreciate the response. I’ll give it a go.

    If anyone else has any other methods, or anything else to add, please feel free.

    Nik

  • Abdiaziz Dhicis

    September 6, 2009 at 9:52 am

    well try closing all open aplications, then go project preference
    then dynamic ram preview setting max to 200 then go on vegas project media tab-
    click lightinning bolt/remove all un used media
    than save restart vegas.
    open vegas then render the project
    good luck

  • Mike South

    December 4, 2009 at 10:56 pm

    Heres what Sony wont tell you

    If they had provided the proper coding in the rendering process to actually use your graphics card to render then rendering would happen MUCH faster

    for example resizing your video frame is done via the cpu, this is a horrid waste of system resources, all modern video cards will do this, this kind of thing is what directx is all about and its why modern HD games play so well

    and if you are rendering to the very popular H.264 format it could render at a minimum of 2x real time if you have a graphics card less than a few years old.

    That sony left out this functionality is sad in a software package at this price (but so did adobe, which is far worse.)

    hopefully they will make this available in a FREE upgrade

  • Makenzie Chambers

    August 23, 2010 at 6:39 am

    My video was short as well, maybe a minute and a half… and it took over 45 minutes to render. Yeah. Someone please reply and help if you can…

  • Guy Rocky

    August 31, 2010 at 6:53 pm

    I agree. I have moved over to SV9 from Avid Xpress as although AVID is pretty solid – its like a landrover – you have to pay for any extras. THe editing in SV9 is much easier and quicker with many more options (though the chroma key could have more features) …. Anyway – I am shocked at the render time. This is a joke. I dont want to spend an hour rendering something only to find it don’t look right. I am rendering a green screen chroma keyed over a still JPG. there are colour and defocus effects on both. The scene is 1.30 mins and it will take 60+ mins to render ….. This makes it really difficult to do quick experiments. What does SV suggest??

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy