Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Something Professional edited in FCPX
-
Something Professional edited in FCPX
Posted by Steve Connor on January 20, 2014 at 8:48 pmhttps://www.televisual.com/news-detail/Elbow-promo-shot-on-Pocket-Cinema-Camera_nid-3772.html
Steve Connor
There’s nothing we can’t argue about on the FCPX COW Forum
Shawn Miller replied 12 years, 3 months ago 11 Members · 28 Replies -
28 Replies
-
Simon Ubsdell
January 20, 2014 at 9:28 pm“The promo was cut on Apple FCP X and graded on Adobe SpeedGrade.”
That’s just weird.
Simon Ubsdell
http://www.tokyo-uk.com -
Timothy Auld
January 20, 2014 at 9:42 pmI just want someone who is dealing with more than 16 audio tracks to tell me honestly, is this really viable? Jeez?! what the Hell do you do? Explicitly?
Tim
-
Simon Ubsdell
January 20, 2014 at 10:11 pm[TImothy Auld] “I just want someone who is dealing with more than 16 audio tracks to tell me honestly, is this really viable? “
Ironically, a lot of feature film edits will often top out at 16 tracks of audio in my experience – but somehow they are the benchmark for professional editing!
It’s a funny old world.
Simon Ubsdell
http://www.tokyo-uk.com -
Shane Ross
January 20, 2014 at 11:05 pm16 TEMP tracks. Holdout from Avid days where that was the max. in FCP I typcially had 16-32 tracks, and have had 24 tracks in Avid as of late. Our temp mixes need to be pretty elaborate.
But total number of audio tracks in a feature mix…done in ProTools typcially…top 100 tracks. But on project where I have no audio mix, it’s just me…I go up to 32 tracks of audio.
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Simon Ubsdell
January 20, 2014 at 11:13 pm[Shane Ross] “16 TEMP tracks.”
Indeed, this is what I meant. And as you say, very old Media Composer holdover. Amazing how many film editors still stick with this format for the day to day business of getting the cut into shape.
Simon Ubsdell
http://www.tokyo-uk.com -
Paul Neumann
January 20, 2014 at 11:53 pmMight be weird, but they were serious. That’s all that matters.
-
Charlie Austin
January 21, 2014 at 12:13 am[TImothy Auld] “I just want someone who is dealing with more than 16 audio tracks to tell me honestly, is this really viable? Jeez?! what the Hell do you do? Explicitly?”
I deal with more than 16 tracks in X every day. No problem at all. If I broke out the compounds here, the thing I’m cutting now has 38-40? “tracks”. (~20 stereo pairs) 🙂 Here’s a little bit of it…
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Charlie Austin
January 21, 2014 at 12:40 am[TImothy Auld] “Seems like a world of workarounds to me.”
I’m not sure I understand what you’re talking about. I wasn’t working around anything. It’s way easier than managing that many tracks in fcp 7.
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Timothy Auld
January 21, 2014 at 12:42 amIf that’s the way it works for you then great. It would not be easier for me.
Tim
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up
