Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Set default dissolve rate in FCPX
-
Set default dissolve rate in FCPX
Posted by C. Park seward on July 29, 2011 at 4:09 pmI heard that you have to set rates in seconds, not frames. Is this true. If it is, one more fact that shows this is a consumer, not professional, editing program.
“…the inability to set the default transition in frames instead of a fraction of a second.”
Is this correct?
Best,
ParkC. Park seward replied 14 years, 9 months ago 5 Members · 16 Replies -
16 Replies
-
Tom Wolsky
July 29, 2011 at 4:41 pmFrames are only meaningful if you’re working in one frame rate format. If you have multiple projects in multiple formats or multiple formats of media in one project a percentage of seconds makes more sense. You have only to see how legacy versions of FCP handled frame rate discrepancies between PAL and NTSC.
All the best,
Tom
Class on Demand DVDs “Complete Training for FCP7,” “Basic Training for FCS” and “Final Cut Express Made Easy”
Coming in 2011 “Complete Training for FCPX”
and “Final Cut Pro X for iMovie and Final Cut Express Users” from Focal Press -
Paul Jay
July 29, 2011 at 6:25 pmThats a ridiculous comment.
Yeah im editing this documentary, its 90000 frames long, because i am a pro. -
Chris Harlan
July 29, 2011 at 6:45 pmNo, I think this is a ridiculous reply. Or at least nonsensically rude.
-
Craig Seeman
July 29, 2011 at 7:59 pmIt reminds me of camera shutter angle. 180° vs 1/60, the latter of which would have a different impact depending on frame rate one is shooting at.
Editing frame rates might be
59.94
50
29.97
25
23.98So a setting of .5 seconds means it’ll be just that duration regardless of time base.
A setting of 15fps might be OK for 29.97 but would be odd for 23.98 which would more likely be 12.
They should have a brief explanation of the rounding used because when editing 25fps one might expect 12 and not 13.Some are used to just changing the default in frames when they set the time base for the project though.
-
Paul Jay
July 29, 2011 at 8:37 pmSaying Final Cut Pro X is just consumer is ridiculous and uninformed.
Final Cut Pro 1 used to be a consumer toy right?
-
Chris Harlan
July 29, 2011 at 9:09 pm[Paul Jay] “Final Cut Pro 1 used to be a consumer toy right?”
No. It wasn’t.
-
C. Park seward
July 29, 2011 at 11:08 pmTom,
I only work in NTSC, transferring legacy Quad and 1″ material to digital files.
I prefer to think in frames. After 40 years, I got quite good at it. I like to say, “trim that two frames minus on the recorder side” instead of “1/15 th of a second”.
Best,
Park -
C. Park seward
July 29, 2011 at 11:11 pmIt’s an opinion. Any editing program that cannot adjust video in frames or fields is not professional, in my humble opinion.
New users who have not worked in editing for long may find other measuring methodology to their liking.
Best,
Park -
Paul Jay
August 1, 2011 at 10:00 amEveryone was calling FCP 1 a consumer toy. And then they took over AVID.
-
Chris Harlan
August 1, 2011 at 5:13 pmJust by repeating something over and over again doesn’t make it true.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up