Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Serious field dominance issues with Canon 550D 25fps PAL footage

  • Serious field dominance issues with Canon 550D 25fps PAL footage

    Posted by Henk Schagen on February 6, 2014 at 9:48 pm

    Hi,

    I’ve been looking and trying forever and I can’t find the answer to this. But I have a project that I shot in 25 fps in PAL mode on my Canon 550D.

    I’ve converted it to Cineform for editing, but because I use text I want to set my project’s field dominance to “none” for smooth rendering.

    But this somehow screws up my 550D footage, as the source files (and so the Cineform files) have their field dominance set to “upper”. Why is this? Is 25 fps PAL somehow interlaced?

    This wasn’t an issue when I shot 23.98 fps with an early project. How can I fix/convert this footage properly (so no de-interlacing plugins)?

    Here is what’s happening: Left is “upper” right is “none”

    Cheers

    Shane Ross replied 12 years, 7 months ago 2 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    February 6, 2014 at 10:12 pm

    FCP doesn’t work well with Cineform…convert to ProRes. What app did you use for the conversion? It might have caused that issue.

    Use Compressor or MPEG STREAMCLIP to convert to ProRes for FCP, you shouldn’t have any issues. Or 5DtoRGB.

    That camera doesn’t shoot interlaced, only progressive. BUT, 1080 is an interlaced format, so even though it might say it’s interlaced, both fields are the same. And HD is always upper field dominant. But if you actually see interlaced lines or a quality loss…the issue is in how you converted.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Henk Schagen

    February 6, 2014 at 10:28 pm

    Thanks for the quick reply Shane!

    That did seem to do the trick. It’s odd that 23.98 fps doesn’t have any issues in FCP7. What codec would you recommend for this kind of footage, HQ or LT?

    HQ creates files twice as big as Cineform and 4 times as big as H264…

  • Shane Ross

    February 6, 2014 at 11:24 pm

    Regular ProRes 422, or LT if drive space concerns you. Yes, Cineform is lighter, but it doesn’t work well in FCP. If you want to edit with FCP, you need to use FCP codecs.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy