Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › seasoned FCP guy but need a little help with HDV
-
seasoned FCP guy but need a little help with HDV
Posted by Rick Neely on October 25, 2007 at 12:08 pmMorning Cow folks,
I do a hoarde of High end SD stuff, but am gonna do my first HDV project and wanted to make sure I am prepared, so asking you guys.
Client has shot native HDV in regular miniDV tapes. I’ve been asked to edit in Native HDV for client. Correct me where I am wrong–
I need to use an HDV deck to ingest despite the video shot on regular DV, yes? If not, will a DSR-11 work?
If I just capture via firewire, I want to use the Apple intermediate HDV codec, yes? (I have an Aja IO LA, btw) Is there a drawback to this method?
The client wanting to edit in Native HDV, my sequence settings will be 1440×1080, upper field first. yes?
Any or all clarification or other interesting things of note would be great. Thanks in advance, guys.
Rick
Peter Dewit replied 18 years, 10 months ago 6 Members · 9 Replies -
9 Replies
-
Andy Mees
October 25, 2007 at 12:28 pm>I need to use an HDV deck to ingest despite the video shot on regular DV, yes? If not, will a DSR-11 work?
correct. you need to ingest from an HDV deck/camera. the DSR-11 will not work
>If I just capture via firewire, I want to use the Apple intermediate HDV codec, yes? (I have an Aja IO LA, btw) Is there a drawback to this method?
Apple Intermediate Codec (AIC) is not HDV. if you intend to edit in native HDV then you should capture as HDV not AIC
>The client wanting to edit in Native HDV, my sequence settings will be 1440×1080, upper field first. yes?
yes … but concern yourself less with those settings. just make sure you use the appropriate Easy Setup then leave the other settings alone and you will be fine
HDV is a breeze to edit with. if you are runnig FCP6 then you can take advantage of using ProRes422 as the render codec (Sequence Settings>>Render tab). The painful part of HDV is the long conform time when mastering back to HDV tape
-
Walter Biscardi
October 25, 2007 at 12:46 pmGood answers all around Andy, I concur with everything he’s saying.
The only thing we do differently here is capture to the DVCPro HD codec as I find that codec much easier to work with and our final output is HDCAM. If the client has specified an HDV workflow, then what Andy suggests is perfect for you.
Walter Biscardi, Jr.
https://www.biscardicreative.comStop Staring Start Grading with Apple Color The new Color Training DVD now available!
https://store.creativecow.net/p/66/stop_staring_and_start_grading_with_apple_colorRead my blog! https://blogs.creativecow.net/WalterBiscardi
-
Chris Poisson
October 25, 2007 at 12:58 pmRick,
The way I do this is set up your sequence as 8 bit or ProRes, and don’t let FCP change the sequence settings when you put in your first clip of HDV. It will have to render but you’ll only be getting one hit, you will not have to conform as you would in an HDV sequence.
Have a wonderful day.
-
Andy Mees
October 25, 2007 at 1:31 pmHey Chris
If you intend to master back to HDV then you will still have to conform regardless of your interim edit codec. Equally, if you already choose to use ProRes as the render codec then surely theres zero benefit to setting your entire sequnece to ProRes422, as when you edit in native HDV then there is no recompression except in those areas that require render.
Cheers
Andy -
Chris Poisson
October 25, 2007 at 1:35 pmHi Andy,
Yes, all true, just that in my workflow I never have reason to go back to HDV, ever. (Yuck!) Don’t mean to mislead our friend here.
Have a wonderful day.
-
Jason Porthouse
October 25, 2007 at 2:07 pmAndy,
Use the KISS principle like others have suggested. Treat HDV exactly as you would DV, use an appropriate HDV deck with the correct Easy Setup and you’ll be fine.
Edit away just as you would any other media.
If you’re mastering back to HDV, you’ll need to give yourself time for the ridiculous HDV conform process, that can take a while for a long-form programme. Like others have stated, I jump to another codec for output if you’re mastering straight to DVD or to any ‘pro’ tape format. If you were using your IoLA to go to Beta, for instance, and your drives were up to it, I’d create a new 16:9 SD sequence using either 8 or 10 bit uncompressed and drop my edited clips in that. Check that FCP has resized them correctly, render and edit to tape.
HDV (as DV) is pants for rendering graphics and compositing, so if you’ve lots of this I’d look in to a similar route.
HTH,
Jason
_________________________________
Before you criticise a man, walk a mile in his shoes.
Then when you do criticise him, you’ll be a mile away. And have his shoes.*the artist formally known as Jaymags*
-
Andy Mees
October 25, 2007 at 2:17 pmthanks for putting me right Jason, i’ll try to remember that 🙂
-
Jason Porthouse
October 25, 2007 at 2:19 pmSorry Andy, brain f**t there. I meant to address my post to Rick.
Something about grandmothers sucking eggs comes to mind 😉
Jason
_________________________________
Before you criticise a man, walk a mile in his shoes.
Then when you do criticise him, you’ll be a mile away. And have his shoes.*the artist formally known as Jaymags*
-
Peter Dewit
October 25, 2007 at 8:52 pmMy only suggestion would be if you are going to need to create a SD version test your workflow for that ahead of time. Downconverting in FCP from HDV to SD formats like DVD can be a real headache at times.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up