Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve Scopebox 3.0

  • Scopebox 3.0

    Posted by Alex Frankland on March 7, 2012 at 2:54 pm

    Hey Guys,

    Has anyone tried the new Scopebox 3.0 for only USD$99 on the Resolve? I’m really curious about how it is… Just wondering if its worth purchasing and if it would preserve CPU performance as opposed to the internal Resolve scopes.

    Any thoughts?

    Regards

    Alex.

    ———————————-
    8-core, OSX 10.7.3, 16GB
    RAID5 4TB,
    Radeon HD 5770, Quadro 4000
    DeckLink HD Extreme 3D
    JVC DT-V24G1
    Resolve 8.1.1 + Wave

    Prathvish Hegde replied 14 years, 1 month ago 9 Members · 24 Replies
  • 24 Replies
  • Robert Houllahan

    March 7, 2012 at 3:10 pm

    I use Scopebox on a Telecine suite with a G5 and I like it allot, it has great looking responsive scopes.

    -Rob-

    Robert Houllahan
    Director / Colorist
    Cinelab Inc.
    http://www.cinelab.com

    MAHC-PRO 6-Core 3X GTX285 20Tb SAS Wave Panel Panny 11UK SDI Plasma.

  • Ola Haldor voll

    March 7, 2012 at 3:12 pm

    I’ve been using it in the beta period. Don’t remember how long, almost 6 months or so. I’ve tracked down bugs and reported them. In my case, it’s a rock solid and customizable set of scopes. In a box.

    I’m not sure you fully understand how it works. You cannot (haven’t tested, nor do I want to really due to possible performance issues) or should not use it on the same computer as Resolve.

    ScopeBox requires some CPU power and some OpenGL power driven by the GPU.
    The way you bring the scopes to life is to input any firewire, webcam, analog or digital video signal, and tell ScopeBox where the signal comes from, what framerate and whether it’s YUV or RGB.

    In my case I have a Mac Pro with 1st generation Decklink HD Extreme. I connect SDI from MP with Resolve > video monitor > MP with Decklink and ScopeBox.

    I’m thinking of getting a Mac Mini and UltraStudio, and make the Mac Pro a bit more useful. Like a FTP/fileserver or something.

  • Alex Frankland

    March 7, 2012 at 3:26 pm

    [Ola Haldor Voll] “The way you bring the scopes to life is to input any firewire, webcam, analog or digital video signal, and tell ScopeBox where the signal comes from, what framerate and whether it’s YUV or RGB.”

    Ahh thanks Ola,

    So considering a have a Mac Pro and a MacBook Pro, could I simply connect the two via Firewire and run scopebox 3.0 off the GPU from my MacBook Pro and link it to Resolve on my MacPro? (Sorry, I’m still learning the basics)

    Alex.

  • Ola Haldor voll

    March 7, 2012 at 4:07 pm

    As far as I know, you cannot use FireWire devices directly with Resolve. You must have a Decklink card or UltraStudio unit to output either composite, component or SDI, which the second computer can input and feed ScopeBox.

    So, if you have a Mac Pro with Decklink, you would most probably want to output SDI to the video monitor. And on the MacBook you’d want UltraStudio so you can input SDI from the monitor (if it has loop through).

  • Juan Salvo

    March 7, 2012 at 4:17 pm

    Have you been able to get scopebox to work with 2k input?

  • Ola Haldor voll

    March 7, 2012 at 8:25 pm

    No, I thought the 1st gen. Decklink HD Extreme wouldn’t have any of it. The option (among 25p) is greyed out.

  • Robert Houllahan

    March 7, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    I think Scopebox is a great product in many ways I really like the scopes and the customizable layout. However it is priced and aimed at a lower end market and is really designed around firewire cameras it is just a somewhat happy accident that it works with SDI via a Decklink card.

    Maybe he could be persuaded to make a Hi-End version that would leave the capture elements behind and support 2K and add features that Colorists would need.

    -Rob-

    Robert Houllahan
    Director / Colorist
    Cinelab Inc.
    http://www.cinelab.com

    MAHC-PRO 6-Core 3X GTX285 20Tb SAS Wave Panel Panny 11UK SDI Plasma.

  • Eric Johnson

    March 7, 2012 at 8:43 pm

    How does scopebox compare to ultrascopes?

  • Mike Woodworth

    March 7, 2012 at 9:02 pm

    Hey Robert,

    Just wanted to correct your last post a bit. Just because ScopeBox has done DV/HDV support better than other tools never meant it was our primary focus. From the beginning we’ve supported all the major 3rd party capture devices. In 3.0 we’ve only increased our focus on third party cards. Blackmagic support is now handled natively — we support their devices through their custom SDK, not quicktime (this is only an option on intel machines, and on PPC we will fall back to quicktime for BMD support).

    Also in 3.0 we are supporting RGB and YUV 10bit natively and frame sizes to 4k and beyond. We may be cheaper than other options, but I assure you we are not focused down market.

    If anyone is having problems scoping a signal they are able to capture with their card, most likely it is a configuration issue. Please contact our support at support@divergentmedia.com for help working through any issues.

    mike

    Mike Woodworth
    CEO and Lead Developer

    divergent media, inc.
    email : mike@divergentmedia.com
    web : https://www.divergentmedia.com

  • Robert Houllahan

    March 7, 2012 at 9:07 pm

    That sounds really good Mike and I really like the product and I am hoping that it will find more of a place here with more tools for Colorists.

    -Rob-

    Robert Houllahan
    Director / Colorist
    Cinelab Inc.
    http://www.cinelab.com

    MAHC-PRO 6-Core 3X GTX285 20Tb SAS Wave Panel Panny 11UK SDI Plasma.

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy