-
RX 480 in a Mac Pro with FCPX benchmark
Hey guys.
We took a quick look at FCPX on a Mac Pro with a RX 480 inside check out the benchmark
Thanks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64fQ3fqxB1E&feature=youtu.be
Host/Creator of Phillip\’s Garage – YouTube Channel dedicated to Real World testing of DaVinci Resolve / FCPX / Adobe
Youtube: goo.gl/Itxzsm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/phillips_garage
Insta: https://www.instagram.com/phillips_garageSome contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
2 Replies
-
For comparison, below are some benchmarks I ran on a 2013 and 2015 iMac 27, comparing to an older 4Ghz Windows PC with a GTX-660. I can’t explain why the BruceX test was so fast on the 2015 iMac (about 19 sec). I re-ran it many times. It shows the danger of relying on a single benchmark which for various (and often unknown) reasons may run abnormally slow or fast on certain platforms.
https://photos.smugmug.com/photos/i-gRvVr9h/0/O/i-gRvVr9h.jpg
-
Thats because of Intel Quick Sync.
It works with i5 and i7 cpu’s and it accelerates just like a GPU would.Its hardware encoding in short, where else a GPU relies on software encoding and the GPU to process the effect etc
Host/Creator of Phillip\’s Garage – YouTube Channel dedicated to Real World testing of DaVinci Resolve / FCPX / Adobe
Youtube: goo.gl/Itxzsm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/phillips_garage
Insta: https://www.instagram.com/phillips_garage
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up