Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Panasonic Cameras Rumors of $1000 US for 8Gig P2 cards

  • Pierre

    October 24, 2005 at 9:01 pm

    Ron-

    I feel the same way that you do. I don’t want to shoot on DV or HDV either, however, when I’m working on a long form project I’ll have to consider until the price of P2 comes down. When I HAVE to shoot on HDV then I guess I’ll use the JVC or the XL-H1 and hope nobody MOVES! Ha Ha 🙁 Otherwise, it’s going to cost “real HD money”.

    Perhaps something spectacular and inexpensive will happen with archiving/storage solutions in the next few months… although I think that realistically the best thing that going to happen to the HVX is a bit of TIME and less expensive P2. I just hope it’s not too long.

    Tape really hasn’t been taken out of the equation with P2 (YET). For now, in most practical circumstances that come to mind, it appears as if P2 has just forced tape to the very end of the workflow.

    Instead of utilizing tape in the beginning for aquistion, you’re utilizing tape in the end, for archiving.

    best,

    Michael

  • Ron Shook

    October 24, 2005 at 9:02 pm

    Graeme,

    [Graeme Nattress] “MXF doesn’t get transcodec to Quicktime. Both MXF and Quicktime are “wrappers’ for the very same underlying DV/DV50/DV100 codec data, so any such conversion should be very rapid.”

    I understand the process. “Transcoded” was a bad choice of words. Would “rewrapped” be better? (g) Or converted? In FCP can this “rewrapping” happen on the fly when the P2 MXF files are ingested, or must they be ingested and then “rewrapped, i.e., is it a one or 2 stage process to make P2 MXF files usable in FCP?

    Ron Shook

  • Ron Shook

    October 24, 2005 at 9:26 pm

    Michael,

    [Michael] “Instead of utilizing tape in the beginning for aquistion, you’re utilizing tape in the end, for archiving.”

    Tape is nearly at an end for archiving as well, and I think everyone needs to ask themselves if putting $25-80k into an HD tape deck makes any but short term sense anymore. Holographic Optical will make its commercial debute sometime in the next year, initially cheaper than tape and probably very inexpensive a year from its commercial introduction. Can we make do with hard drive archiving, perhaps doubling up for added safety, until then? I think so. The commodity IT revolution is nearly upon us for everything but camera heads, lenses and display devices, i.e., the opposite ends of the content creation chain. The rest is all computer hardware and software.

    Ron Shook

  • Ron Shook

    October 24, 2005 at 9:37 pm

    Luis,

    [Luis Caffesse] “It was my understanding that Avid works directly with native DVCPro P2 MXF files.”

    If that’s the case, it’s a very good thing.

    Ron Shook

  • Accountclosedduetopolicyviolations

    October 24, 2005 at 10:40 pm

    [Ron Shook] “The Firestore drive, if it proves to be self-contained, is a step in the right direction and a solution for some types of production with the HGX-200 or other P2 camcorders”

    Ron,
    I would not shoot on anything conected to camera with “firewire cable”.
    It can easily come apart and be disconected.
    I just like solid memory solutions.

  • Ron Shook

    October 24, 2005 at 10:44 pm

    Jiri,

    [jiri vrozina] “I just like solid memory solutions.”

    Hey, so do I, but paying for that solution is another story.

    Ron

  • Accountclosedduetopolicyviolations

    October 24, 2005 at 11:08 pm

    20 years ago people spent $100 000 – $250 000 for post and $50000 for camera.
    10 years people spent $50,000 – 100,000 for post and 50,000 for camera.
    Today people spent $10,000 for post and $5,000 for camera.
    People are discussing at forums Low end gear like Vegas(because it is cheap and it costs $400) and they are not talking and writing about far superior editing solutions
    like smoke*.
    We are talking about Z1 and Canon H1 instead discussing far superior video cameras.
    Are we really going forward(as our fathers and grandfathers did),or are we following
    Indians and Asians in the way we do business???
    Is the “cheapest” way the best way?!
    Is our living standard going down as well??

    Sorry for this,but I like going forward,even if it costs the money.
    I do no like to watch “amateur,family holiday” docos on TV shot by “anybody” on cheapest gear possible…It makes me tired.

    Our industry is going down becasuse of that.
    For Instance check all the forums here and see how many posts are at smoke* forum
    and Vegas forum.
    How many are at HDV forum and HD High End forum.
    People think because they buy $5,000 camera they become cameramen and filmakers.
    In this case I will buy some “knifes” and become a surgent…

    I really moved away from P2 this time.
    Bottom line is:if you want to do something properly,you will need proper tools
    which will cost real money….

    …and now lets talk about 14bit,6 megapixel Varicam on P2 which will shoot all the formats……….

    p.s. I hope I did not offend anybody by my remarks.

  • Graeme Nattress

    October 25, 2005 at 12:48 am

    I don’t fully know the workflow yet, but either way, there’s no reason why it can’t be quick.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Pierre

    October 25, 2005 at 1:19 am

    Jiri,

    You wrote: “Are we really going forward(as our fathers and grandfathers did),or are we following
    Indians and Asians in the way we do business???”

    That’s really offensive to me and I doubt I stand alone. Please keep those type of comments to yourself.

    thank you,

    Michael

  • Blub06

    October 25, 2005 at 1:41 am

    I don

Page 2 of 5

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy