-
quicktime problems for adobe cc
-
I was pointing a finger towards adobe because i was taking about adobe even though i know most if not all win nle use qt as far as i know.
Ricardo Marty
-
[Andrew Kimery] “Regardless, I can’t see how Adobe is at fault for any of this which was my only point.”
And your point is well taken.
It’s not Adobe’s fault.
And it’s not Apple’s fault.
The reason I know this is that the whole thing is currently a massive tempest in a teapot since the ENTIRE debate revolves around a theoretical vulnerability that nobody’s encountered in the wild yet. AFAIK nobody has lost a SINGLE pixel of data based on this whole thing.
Yet people are talking about it like it’s the coming apocalypse and that the ONLY THING TO DO TO REMAIN SAFE – is to start de-installing everything right down to your aunts wedding pictures.
The whole thing makes me think of THIS.
Those durn Christian Science Monitor knuckleheads with their “reasoning” and all…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5u_A61KagU
New signature under construction and coming soon. Please stand by…
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
[Walter Soyka] “Remember, friends don’t let friends spec ProRes for mastering.”
Tell that to PBS.
My entire post workflow is now dominated by the need to deliver ProRes for broadcast. If that changed I’d be off OSX and busy researching which new PC workstation I was buying along with planing my future infrastructure for the next 5 years. As it is I’m delaying everything, making do with what I can and spending as little as possible waiting for a workable solution to arise. Apple won’t build what I want, won’t license what I need to others, and still has a stranglehold on my deliverables.
Hopefully Apple’s NDA only meetings at NAB revealed answer’s to all my problems that I am simply to lowly to be allowed to know.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin\’ attached to nothin\’
\”Deciding the spine is the process of editing\” F. Bieberkopf -
[Herb Sevush] “Hopefully Apple’s NDA only meetings at NAB revealed answer’s to all my problems that I am simply to lowly to be allowed to know.”
Lowly? All you had to do was be there. The only requirement was being awake at 9am to get in line. In Vegas, i guess that’s a tough one actually…
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~ -
[Charlie Austin] “Lowly? All you had to do was be there. The only requirement was being awake at 9am to get in line. In Vegas, i guess that’s a tough one actually…”
EXACTLY this.
The only qualification needed to have seen what was shown in the Apple presentation was wanting to be there and agreeing to sign the NDA. Period.
As I noted before, you didn’t even need an NAB attendees badge.
BTW, everyone reading this should look for Charlie’s FCPeXchange suite demo when it goes up (hopefully this week) – it’s awesome!
The way he works “versioning” via Share for his trailer stems and exports alone really reveals why the X workflow is so singular.
I suspect it’s gonna be eye opening for a lot of editors.
FWIW.
New signature under construction and coming soon. Please stand by…
-
[Bill Davis] “[Charlie Austin] “Lowly? All you had to do was be there. The only requirement was being awake at 9am to get in line. In Vegas, i guess that’s a tough one actually…”
EXACTLY this.
The only qualification needed to have seen what was shown in the Apple presentation was wanting to be there and agreeing to sign the NDA. Period.”
Apart from the overwhelming majority of us FCPX users that WEREN’T in Vegas, it’s nice that you all got a sneak look though.
-
[Bill Davis] “The only qualification needed to have seen what was shown in the Apple presentation was wanting to be there and agreeing to sign the NDA.”
And knowing the meeting existed and where and when it was being held and who could attend. Maybe I’m totally to blame and it was written up in NAB Today or any of the other guides that were being handed out all over the place – then it’s my bad.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin\’ attached to nothin\’
\”Deciding the spine is the process of editing\” F. Bieberkopf -
[Herb Sevush] “Maybe I’m totally to blame and it was written up in NAB Today or any of the other guides that were being handed out all over the place – then it’s my bad”
You would have had to have been keeping tabs with FCP Works on the FCP Exchange workshop and registered (free) for their sessions. It was listed on their session agenda for each of the two days. Since FCP Exchange is not an official NAB event, there wouldn’t really be any coverage through NAB. Although some folks, like me, mentioned it in NAB Preview articles.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
[Herb Sevush] “And knowing the meeting existed and where and when it was being held and who could attend.”
You’re right, and I’m not sure why the FCP Works schedule wasn’t posted here, it’s on the usual FCP sites of course as Oliver mentioned. I should have probably posted the schedule here, as I was “presenting”…. but I wasn’t really sure what I was gonna “present” so I didn’t.
I did get to see the Apple presentation and learned that they are working on stuff and appear to be listening to user feedback. 🙂
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~\”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.\”~
~\”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented\”~ -
[Herb Sevush] “And knowing the meeting existed and where and when it was being held and who could attend. Maybe I’m totally to blame and it was written up in NAB Today or any of the other guides that were being handed out all over the place – then it’s my bad.”
Well….
IIRC, I posted in a thread right here on Monday – soon after the first Apple presentation – the fact that the entire audience had been put under NDA.
I think that was a pretty decent signal that something unusual had happened.
This is a heavily read board. And I think it’s fair to say one of the focal points for info about these NLEs on the entire web.
There were under 50 seats for each of the Apple Exchange presentations – not because they were trying to exclude anyone, but because FCPWorks is a private company and snagging a demo space next door to the big show is likely both difficult and extremely costly.
Both Apple demos were SRO packed to the gills – to the point we had to turn people away at the risk of Fire Code violations.
So again, the issue was honestly ONLY whether or not you wanted to be there and how much. If you did – you could be. If you were iffy or didn’t – nope. The seats got filled by those who DID want to be there more than you did. Simple as that.
New signature under construction and coming soon. Please stand by…
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up