Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Media 100 Project compatibilty Producer/Media100i

  • Project compatibilty Producer/Media100i

    Posted by Alexxg on October 28, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    Hello,

    can anyone tell me, if Media100i 8.2.3a and Producer are project compatible?

    At 8.2.3a Download it is said:
    “Media 100i is now compatible with Media 100 HD and Media 100 sw. This allows you to
    seamlessly move media between systems.”

    But at Producer Product Info it is said:
    “Ability to move programs backward and forward between Media 100 version 11.x systems”

    Second Question is:
    Is a “network-RAID-Fileserver” (example: https://www.infrant.com/products/products_details.php?name=ReadyNAS%201000S )
    fast enough to work the same time with Media100i/orHDe and Producer?

    Alexxg replied 19 years, 6 months ago 3 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Abercrombie Pupputnick

    October 28, 2006 at 8:08 pm

    You can move MEDIA back to 8.2.3a, not bins or programs or projects.

  • Floh Peters

    October 29, 2006 at 9:22 am

    [AlexxG] “can anyone tell me, if Media100i 8.2.3a and Producer are project compatible?”

    As SoftHarbor says, you can move media files from Producer to V8.2.3 and vice versa. But “Project data” (timelines, bins and Projects) can be moved only from V8 to Producer and not back. You can exchange all those data between Producer and V11(.5) hardware based systems.

    [AlexxG] “Is a “network-RAID-Fileserver” (example: https://www.infrant.com/products/products_details.php?name=ReadyNAS%201000S )
    fast enough to work the same time with Media100i/orHDe and Producer? “

    It depends on what you want to do and what data rates you need. Producer and HDe can work in Uncompressed 10bit HD mode, and then this box is definitely not fast enough. If you

  • Alexxg

    October 29, 2006 at 11:36 am

    Thank you (both) very much for your replies.
    So I think we will “upgrade” to HDe or SDe.

    Floh wrote: “One thing you should consider is that it is a network-based solution, and the underlying network protocols are simply not designed for high-performance video data transfer.”

    Until now we only work with SD-Material compressed with 360 kBit(?) (maximum quality in Media100i).
    But in the Future the Footage-Server should be fast enough after a switch to HD-Material.
    Which solution would be fast enough? What about the “FibreChannel-Server” you talk about on your homepage?

    Excuse my bad english, but I don

  • Floh Peters

    October 30, 2006 at 11:22 am

    [AlexxG] “Excuse my bad english, but I don

  • Alexxg

    October 31, 2006 at 10:13 am

    [Floh]
    If a SAN could be interesting for you and you need more info let me know.”

    I don

  • Floh Peters

    October 31, 2006 at 3:17 pm

    [AlexxG] “But o.k., NAS is not SAN,and it seems, that SAN should be what we need. And as I don

  • Alexxg

    November 1, 2006 at 11:33 am

    Thank you very much Floh for your explaination and spending so much time.
    I think it is enough information to discuss what solution will be best for our needs.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy