Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums AJA Video Systems Progressive footage thru Kona 3 looks like a fielding problem

  • Progressive footage thru Kona 3 looks like a fielding problem

    Posted by Tim Langston on November 2, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    For the past year or two or three I have not been able to shoot Progressive footage because of it looking bad thru my Kona 3 card & breakout box. The footage looks like it has interlaced field reversal. I know about panning too fast and the look you get when doing that, it’s not that look, this is more like an image lag or un-stable frames. I’ve taken my footage into the station I work at and have had an editor ingest it and it looks like it should, I’ve also taken it to a good friend and it looks great on his AJA system. AJA has walked me through my setting in FCP and all are correct, unless we missed something. They have also sent me a replacement card to see if this corrects the problem, it didn’t work. I was wondering if anyone else has had an issue like this?

    I shoot using an HPX500, HVX200 and a Canon 7D, all 1080, 720 30p and 24p have this look. I edit on a Mac Pro Dual 2.8GHz Quad Core with 8 Gig Ram, 8 TB Raid hooked onto an Atto R380, monitor it using the component out on the Kona 3’s Breakout Box into a Panasonic Plasma and also going Serial Digital out of the Kona 3’s Breakout Box into an AJA D5CE then to an old Sony cube monitor. It’s got to be a monitoring issue, right?

    Thanks for any help or suggestions that you can give me,
    Tim

    Tim Langston
    Cryin’ Out Loud Productions
    Fort Wayne, IN
    http://www.colproductions.com

    Jeremy Garchow replied 15 years, 6 months ago 3 Members · 15 Replies
  • 15 Replies
  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 2, 2010 at 9:06 pm

    It’s all about the settings. If you’re working in 720p, there’s never any hint of interlacing ever on a properly setup system and your monitoring 720p. If monitoring SD, there could be some interlacing as the signal is converted, same for 1080i (or psf for that matter).

  • Tim Langston

    November 3, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    OK, then what the heck am I missing? How about running over settings for 1080 24pa and 1080 30p for me. I must be forgetting something.

    Thanks,
    Tim

    Tim Langston
    Cryin’ Out Loud Productions
    Fort Wayne, IN
    http://www.colproductions.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 3, 2010 at 1:08 pm

    First, you tell me what you do to setup, let’s say, a 24pA project.

  • Tim Langston

    November 3, 2010 at 2:17 pm

    1080pa

    I import my P2 footage into FCP with Advanced Pulldown removal checked. I make sure FCP is at High video playback quality.
    Easy Setup AJA Kona 3- 1080p 24 DVCPro HD.
    Make sure field dominance is set to none, make sure Motion Filtering Quality is set to best, make sure Master Templates and Motion Projects Quality is set to Best.
    Check Clip format and make sure field dominance is set to none.
    Make sure Video Playback is set to AJA Kona 3 1080i29.97 8 Bit (1920 x 1080).

    Thanks,
    Tim

    Tim Langston
    Cryin’ Out Loud Productions
    Fort Wayne, IN
    http://www.colproductions.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 3, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    [Tim Langston] “Easy Setup AJA Kona 3- 1080p 24 DVCPro HD. “

    Easy setup should be AJA Kona 3 psf 23.98 DVCPro HD.

    Then change the output to 1080i if that’s what you want.

  • Tim Langston

    November 3, 2010 at 8:28 pm

    Thanks, did that, frames look more solid but the judder is enough to make one sick. For the look I want I guess I would need to spend over 30 or 40 thousand on a camera??? The HPX500 must not be able to put out the look I’m after. I just don’t understand why I can’t get it to look a little like some of the shows on HGTV, House Hunters, or Property Virgins, when shot in progressive, you can see that it has some judder but nothing like what I get, maybe it’s the price difference in cameras.

    Thanks for all your help,
    Tim

    Tim Langston
    Cryin’ Out Loud Productions
    Fort Wayne, IN
    http://www.colproductions.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 3, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    [Tim Langston] “I just don’t understand why I can’t get it to look a little like some of the shows on HGTV, House Hunters, or Property Virgins, when shot in progressive, you can see that it has some judder but nothing like what I get, maybe it’s the price difference in cameras. “

    Wait, is this you again?:

    https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/193/881323

  • Tim Langston

    November 3, 2010 at 8:33 pm

    Yeap, me again. Still having problems.

    Tim Langston
    Cryin’ Out Loud Productions
    Fort Wayne, IN
    http://www.colproductions.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 3, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    And you have you tried 1080i yet?

  • Tim Langston

    November 3, 2010 at 8:46 pm

    1080i is what I’ve been stuck shooting for the pass 2 or 3 years, I have never been able to get my progressive to look good. I even sold a monitor thinking it was the monitor doing it. Of course the monitor was 240 lbs. so I was glad to see it go.

    Tim

    Tim Langston
    Cryin’ Out Loud Productions
    Fort Wayne, IN
    http://www.colproductions.com

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy