Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects Pixelation when importing hi-res stills

  • Pixelation when importing hi-res stills

    Posted by Jack Kelly on October 30, 2005 at 5:51 pm

    Dear Creative Cowers,

    When I try importing high-resolution (6MP) images into AE, it pixelates them. The images look absolutely fine if I open them in AE in the “footage” window but they loose a lot of definition when I insert the images into my PAL 16:9 composition.

    At first glance, I thought I was zooming too far into the image but I’m only scaling up to 60% so that can’t be the problem. Then I thought the problem might have occured during AE’s conversion from square pixels to non-square… so I tried changing the still’s pixel aspect ratio in PS CS2 and then importing that into AE… but that had no effect at all!

    Yes, I am previewing at full quality. And this pixelation artifact remains in the rendered output.

    Any help would be very greatly appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

    Steve Roberts replied 20 years, 6 months ago 3 Members · 14 Replies
  • 14 Replies
  • Jack Kelly

    October 31, 2005 at 10:26 am

    Here are some illustrations:

    The image directly below is what it should look like. I took this image from the “footage” window in After Effects:

    The image below is what the image looks like once I’ve imported it into the composition. Note the jaggies on the guy’s trousers.

    And below is proof that I’m using the best quality settings and that I haven’t zoomed into the image at all.

    Any ideas why I’m seeing jaggies on the image after I import it into the composition?

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

  • Jack Kelly

    October 31, 2005 at 10:47 am

    Oh… and I’ve tried setting the “origin” to various different values and that doesn’t work either.

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

  • David Frisk

    October 31, 2005 at 10:47 am

    Well in your screenshot it looks as though you have the PAR correction on which would make the quality worsen. I’m not sure what the settings were of your comp for the posted pics, but what happens if you make the comp with the exact same settings as the picture (drag your picture onto the “new composition” icon)? Does it still look that way?

  • Jack Kelly

    October 31, 2005 at 10:55 am

    Hi!

    Many thanks for the reply.

    If I drag the picture onto the “new comp” icon then it does have exactly the same jaggy problems!

    What is the “PAR correction”? I’ve looked for it in the help but no joy!

    Thanks again for your reply,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

  • David Frisk

    October 31, 2005 at 11:05 am

    Pixel Aspect Ratio correction is for when you’re working with non-square pixels. Since computer monitors have square pixels, images made up of non-square pixels look a little stretched. So they have the PAR correction button which adjusts the picture so that it looks more like it would on a TV, as opposed to the distorted way it kind of looks on your monitor. However, when you use it, the picture loses a little quality. It looks like yours is turned on.

    The button is located at the bottom of the comp window. It’s the button just to the right of where you pick your camerea view (Yours is set to “Active Camera”). So hit the button just to the right of it to turn it off, because I think you have it turned on.

  • Jack Kelly

    October 31, 2005 at 11:22 am

    Sorry, I was being dense… I forgot PAR = Pixel Aspect Ratio!

    I tried togling the PAR button but no joy… the image imported into the comp has more jaggies than the same image in the “footage” window, albeit slightly reduced.

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

  • David Frisk

    October 31, 2005 at 11:28 am

    Sorry, I’m out of ideas. I’m thinking somethings gotta be set weird in your comp settings or something if it looks fine in the footage window…but I really couldn’t tell you for sure.

    Maybe someone tomorrow can help you. Best of luck.

  • Jack Kelly

    October 31, 2005 at 11:30 am

    OK, thanks!

    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

  • Steve Roberts

    October 31, 2005 at 2:16 pm

    Yep, PAR correction does muck it up.
    And having the image at a half-pixel position can muck it up … hmm …

    Can you show us a screengrab of the image info in the project window? Maybe it’s RAW or something, and should be a TIFF or PSD. Maybe.

    And maybe a new screengrab of the comp with PAR correction off.

    Steve

  • Jack Kelly

    October 31, 2005 at 2:25 pm

    Hi,

    Thanks loads for your reply.

    The images aren’t RAW. I shot raw and then used PS CS2’s RAW converter to convert the images to 16-bit PSD files.

    I originally imported these 16-bit PSD files directly into AE. Then, when I noticed the nasty jaggies, I tried outputting 8-bit TIFFs from PS and importing these into AE. The jaggies remained no matter if the files are TIFFs or PSDs.

    I will upload some more (thrilling) screen-grabs tonight (in about 9 hours, at 10pm GMT!)

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy