physical render or vray or switch to learn maya for real world photo realistic render

[Andy Henik]

I don’t know, didn’t really work so much with the Physical render, and AE compositions. I use more standard render and only is nessesary I use GI. It makes it easier for me to create compositions in AE. Also renders much faster (Excapt the GI of course).
I will try the vRay later on. Am busy right now, but hope to find the time soon.
Thanx
Andy

[Bill Kelly]

Have you tried using a Physical Sky in your scene. It really helps with the realism even using the Standard Renderer with some ambient occlusion. Try it with and without GI. You may find that without GI looks as good or better as with GI.

All the daylight shots in this gallery from my blog that I’m linking to were rendered using the Physical Sky with the Standard Renderer with AO but no GI. Average rendering time was around 10 minutes per frame.

https://thekellzone.com/?p=539

To see tutorials, articles, tips, free stuff, and more visit my post-production blog at https://thekellzone.com

[Nizaryos Nassour]

yes i used physical sky no gi with ambient occlusion but the problem was the settings in physical sky options