OT: FCP Splash Screen

[Shane Ross]

THis has been discussed a lot in the past on this and other forums, but I am hard pressed to find links, as I don’t know what search words to look for. But as far as we can tell, it is just arbitrary. They did change from FCP3 to FCP 4.5…because the frames used to read 28, and that ticked off a few PAL people, who only have 25frames.

So I hear.

Shane

GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

[David Bogie]

Somewhere on the Net is a photo taken of an Apple banner that was on display at the 2009 WWDC where Snow Leopard was a main topic of discussion. Several of the application icons on the banner were subtly different from the ones we know and love and IIRC FCP was slightly different.

Anyone remember where that photo originated? I’ve checked wired.com and Macworld for their WWDC coverage sets.

here’s a uselessly small copy:
https://images.macworld.com/images/news/graphics/140959-wwdcbanner_original.jpg

bogiesan

[Captain Mench]

Hey Dave… here is where it WAS…

https://images.appleinsider.com/apple_legal_2004.gif

Seems someone else didn’t want anyone knowing that 64bit FCP was in the wild… oh wait… IS IT????

hee.

Mike

[Paulo Jan]

Don’t know about FCP, but in the case of the 404 error, the HTTP spec describes several responses that the web server can send to the browser. The “OK” ones start with 2 (“200” = “OK, I’m sending you the page”), the 30x’s I don’t remember right now what they mean (though “302” is a redirect to another URL), and the errors start all with 4 (“401” = “access forbidden”). So… I don’t know: my hunch is that it would be very contrived if someone had carefully written the spec (including the organization above) just so that the 404 error matched a specific room number, but I don’t actually know one way or another.