Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple OS X OSX 10.4 Tiger upgrade destoy RAID-0 from 10.3.x

  • OSX 10.4 Tiger upgrade destoy RAID-0 from 10.3.x

    Posted by Dejwy_k on July 13, 2005 at 1:54 pm

    I thing, that 10.4 uipgrade is the worst Apple upgrade yet.
    Upgrading system from 10.3.x to 10.4 with RAID-0 disc cause to destroy this RAID.
    Apple upgraded Disk utility to new version, but it seems to be uncompatible backwards with RAID from 10.3.x

    And without message are all data lost.

    poseidon$ diskutil checkRAID


    RAID SETS
    ---------

    Name: videoraid2
    Unique ID: 02387389-3C64-11D9-965F-000A95D49B7A
    Type: Stripe
    Status: Offline
    Device Node: disk4
    Apple RAID Version: 1
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    # Device Node UUID Status
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    0 disk3s3 FE0ED303-4DBD-4B5A-A77A-BB28F44EDD13 Offline
    1 Unknown Missing/Damaged
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    poseidon:$ diskutil list
    /dev/disk0
    #: type name size identifier
    0: Apple_partition_scheme *152.7 GB disk0
    1: Apple_partition_map 31.5 KB disk0s1
    2: Apple_HFS DruhyDisk 152.5 GB disk0s3
    /dev/disk1
    #: type name size identifier
    0: Apple_partition_scheme *149.1 GB disk1
    1: Apple_partition_map 31.5 KB disk1s1
    2: Apple_HFS Macintosh HD 148.9 GB disk1s3

    /dev/disk2
    #: type name size identifier
    0: *613.5 GB disk2
    /dev/disk3
    #: type name size identifier
    0: Apple_partition_scheme *613.5 GB disk3
    1: Apple_partition_map 126.0 KB disk3s1
    2: Apple_Driver_OpenFirmware 512.0 KB disk3s2
    3: Apple_Boot_RAID 613.5 GB disk3s3
    /dev/disk4
    #: type name size identifier
    0: *1.2 TB disk4


    —-

    RAID was made fro disk2+disk3, but /dev/disk2 donk know that belong to RAID on /dev/disk4 and in system is seen as normal unformated volume

    Thank you Apple – perfect work :-((

    Mitch Ives replied 20 years, 9 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • John Foley

    July 13, 2005 at 2:32 pm

    Since the Apple RAID 0 is a software RAID, it is wise to consider this before upgrading from one major OS version to another.

    I unloaded my two drive RAID system before installing Tiger, but amazingly, it was still active when I booted up after the install.

    As it is ALWAYS suggested – be sure to BACKUP any thing important before updating or installing software.

  • Dejwy_k

    July 13, 2005 at 3:07 pm

    You are right, backuping is right way,
    But make backwards incompatible OS without warning users is not good way.

    Uunaccesible drive/raid after upgrade – it is good, because I can connect discs to 10.3.x system and use data.
    But destroing data on discs – it is the worse case.

    If software RAID version was changed – system must warn users, and dont change anything on discs to prevent data and not destoy data and destroy RAID.

    Unaccesible data can be accessed in 10.3.x, but 10.4 dont make data inaccesible, but 10.4 destoy RAID and data cannot be accessed anymore from any (old or new) system..

  • Mitch Ives

    July 13, 2005 at 4:17 pm

    [John Foley] “I unloaded my two drive RAID system before installing Tiger, but amazingly, it was still active when I booted up after the install.”

    Same here… upgrading to 10.4 did not cause the loss of my RAID either (SATA raid 0).

    Mitch Ives
    Insight Productions Corp.
    mitch@insightproductions.com
    http://www.insightproductions.com

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy