Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy New MacPros yes i want one!

  • Pat Mcgowan

    March 3, 2009 at 9:38 pm

    On reflection I’m not really too annoyed. Needed a machine last week, bought a great computer for a reasonable price……whatever.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    March 3, 2009 at 9:42 pm

    [Pat McGowan] “On reflection I’m not really too annoyed. Needed a machine last week, bought a great computer for a reasonable price……whatever.”

    Totally. I have a pre2008 MacPro and it still runs very nice.

  • Colin Chandler

    March 3, 2009 at 11:06 pm

    I’ll wait for the mid-term upgrade I think. Now they’ve jumped to the Nehalem processor architecture, next step are the 8-core processors that Intel have already shown – 16 core Mac Pro might actually make a major step. Wonder where they’ll have to stick the RAM for that box – nice little 2nd floor extension perhaps?

    We do a lot of work in Motion, so I’d really like ATI to do a 4870 X2 for the Mac? The 3870 was certainly a step in the right direction as far as Motion is concerned, but why only the 4870? I would’ve thought at the profesional end of the market, options should be geared to major steps in performance, not just bumps…

    Major problem with the mini-display port to DVI adapters is they don’t work well with high-res monitors. There have been a lot of problems running 24″ and 30″ LCDs on them, even Cinema displays let alone Dells and such.

  • Andrew Clark

    March 3, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    The benchmarks on the Apple site compare the previous generation 3.2ghz 8-core vs. the current 2.93ghz…which shows a performance gain…albeit a slight one.

    Just curious though, if one was to choose the 2.26ghz 8-core setup; what the benchmarks would be rated at compared to the 3.2ghz?

  • Sean Donnelly

    March 4, 2009 at 12:41 am

    My question is why no high end nVidia option? A quadro fx 5800 w/ sdi would have been a HUGE advantage.

    -Sean

  • Colin Chandler

    March 4, 2009 at 2:43 am

    Probably due to quadro sales being extremely flat on the Mac and in the current economic climate, no-one was going to pay to continue developing them.

  • Sean Donnelly

    March 4, 2009 at 3:05 am

    Which is really unfortunate. Even though apple seems to prefer ATI, the quadro adds a LOT of processing power.

    -Sean

  • Sean Donnelly

    March 4, 2009 at 3:05 am

    Which is really unfortunate. Even though apple seems to prefer ATI, the quadro adds a LOT of processing power.

    -Sean

  • Ben Holmes

    March 4, 2009 at 9:05 am

    Exactly the point I made above to David. The comparison of the new 2.26 to the old 3.2 8-cores is really the relevant one – as they are approximately the same price.

    I’m reserving judgement until barefeats get their hands on one, and benchmark it.

    Edit Out Ltd
    —————————-
    FCP Editor/Trainer/System Consultant
    EVS/VT Supervisor for live broadcast
    RED camera transfer/post
    Independent Director/Producer

  • Rafael Amador

    March 4, 2009 at 4:53 pm

    Thanks for the answer Walter.
    I think soon will be the time for the Mac Pro, but before I need to find room to set it up.
    I wish I’d have a nice place like yours.
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

Page 6 of 7

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy