-
Neat Video, AFX vs PPro?
Anyone have any info on the Neat Video 3.2 noise reduction plug-in performance between these two platforms? I know AE cannot open .MTS so advantage PPro right there.
But noise reduction takes a long time to render, so if AE is faster using Neat Video, then maybe an intermediate export from PPro would be better time wise.
Eh…it’s only $160 for both…might as well just get them.
-
4 Replies
-
AE has no problem with mts files.
———————————————–
Adobe Certified Expert Premiere Pro CS6
Adobe Community Professional -
Thnx Ann but your reply is not entirely true. There are many different cameras that record to .mts that AE does not import or imports incorrectly, no audio etc. I just received some .mts footage that AE will NOT open but PPro does. So…YMMV as always.
Even PPro CS6 has some major issues with .mts but seems to be more reliable, at least to me, for the most part.
So anyway, thank you for your input.
-
I know about the spanned mts clips not working.
I wonder if you can upload (wetransfer or deposite files) a clip that wont open in AE for me to try.
I think its system related and not camera.———————————————–
Adobe Certified Expert Premiere Pro CS6
Adobe Community Professional -
Thanks for the offer Ann but it’s not that big of a deal. The 4.5 GB clip is from a consumer “1080p HD” camera. It imports into PPro CS6 just fine. AE cannot even see “see” the clip for import, it is greyed out.
Again, this .mts business does not matter so much. I was more concerned about Neat Video performance AE vs PPro.
It appears that CS6 broke something and actually adds new artifacts to video with or without the Neat Video plug. The topic is covered on the Neat Video forum. https://www.neatvideo.com/nvforum/viewtopic.php?t=769
I seems Adobe is aware of the problem but will not address the issue.
Anyone have more info?
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up