Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Mpeg renderring

  • Mpeg renderring

    Posted by Steve on March 30, 2006 at 11:19 pm

    Ok well before we get into details let me just state the basic info: Vegas 6 with the newest build. Ok now let’s get into the tricky stuff. So I have homemade stuff shot with a dv cam, now I composite with Ae and edit it with vegas, everything looks great, so I come to render. Now since I’m just a home user, well when I got my computer i installed something called the k-lite codec pack, which installed an mpeg decoder (I had the choice between mainconcept, ligos and elucard, i chose mainconcept), although I doubt that effects what ever I’m renderring but I mentionend it just in case. So right after installing the codecs, when I go render mpeg2 in vegas, I’m able to choose my custom settings, but the day after, boom everytime I press custom nothing happens… which is my fist question (why can’t i edit the templates), secondly, when ever I render with the default ntsc mpeg2 template, it’s kind of blocky, dessaturated and the color red looks horrible. So I was wonderring firstly, how come I can’t change my template settings, and secondly, why are my renders (and I’ll get the same problem if I use premiere as a renderer, dessaturated and blocky, but red looks fine) such poor quality in terms of saturation and contrast. Thank you, all replies are welcome and much appreciated.

    Steve replied 20 years, 2 months ago 4 Members · 10 Replies
  • 10 Replies
  • Edward Troxel

    March 31, 2006 at 3:02 am

    First of all, the codec pack is almost certainly the cause of your problem and should be uninstalled. However, here is a common reason why the “custom” button does not work:
    https://www.jetdv.com/vegas/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6

    Edward Troxel
    JETDV Scripts

  • Steve

    March 31, 2006 at 4:52 am

    Ok so the custom button thing worked like a charm, thank you very much, now as far as the pack goes, how do you suggest I acquire my codecs, and when it comes to mpeg encoding and decoder, what do I install, sorry I’m totally clueless 🙁 when it comes to this.

  • Stubenkastl

    March 31, 2006 at 5:15 am

    If the registry has only those entries and nothing else the system might not work anymore :-)))

    Here your advise:

    —————————————————————————-
    Look in your registry, and make sure it only has these entries, and nothing else.

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Sony Media Software\MC MPEG Plug-In\1.0\License]
    “CurrentKey”=”XX-XXXXXX-XXXXXX-XXXXXX”
    “InstFlags”=dword:00000010

  • Steve

    March 31, 2006 at 5:21 am

    ok so i did the registry thing, I uninstalled the codec pack, now i rendered a test and it looked the same, here are screenshots:

    Uncompressed:
    https://img90.imageshack.us/img90/521/uncompressed2yv.png

    Mpeg2 via vegas, after uninstalled the k-lite codec pack (b4 it was a little worst):
    https://img224.imageshack.us/img224/1304/mpeg28dc.png

    Thanks once again.

  • Stephen Mann

    March 31, 2006 at 8:28 am

    I suspect that you are looking at differences in the colorspace. Uncompressed, if I recall, uncompressed colorspace is 4:4:4 and MPEG2 is 4:2:0

    Stephen Mann
    MannMade Digital Video
    San Jose, CA

  • Steve

    March 31, 2006 at 10:31 pm

    …so how do I get a cleaner look ? because I’m really on a thight schedule here and everyday I try to figure this out is a big loss lol.

  • Stephen Mann

    April 1, 2006 at 8:28 am

    I think that what you are seeing as “desaturated” is an illusion because the MPEG encoding has softened the edges a bit as a result of the aliasing of the diagonal lines. I brought both images into Photoshop and cut a piece of the red at the same place on both images then placed them adjacent to each other. If there were any difference in the color or saturation, I should have been able to see a line where the two samples joined.

    The granularity that you see is clearly the nature of MPEG encoding. There’s not enough color samples in the image to maintain smooth lines, especially diagonals.

    What is the destination display mode? If it’s a normal interlaced NTSC display, then the softening of the MPEG image is actually good. Sharp color edges are a real pain in the butt for monitors, especially red.

    Stephen Mann
    MannMade Digital Video
    San Jose, CA

  • Steve

    April 1, 2006 at 3:12 pm

    they 4:3 progressive, but how do they good nice colors in like “hollywood movies”, Im not going to go out and buy and hardware and equipement lol but it would be nice to keep a sharper image.

  • Stephen Mann

    April 1, 2006 at 7:28 pm

    ” they 4:3 progressive, but how do they good nice colors in like “hollywood movies”, Im not going to go out and buy and hardware and equipement lol but it would be nice to keep a sharper image.”

    Hollywood does two things that make the images look better. It’s not hardware or software as much as it is technique and knowing what goes on during the encoding.

    First, if it’s a title screen, they use pure colors. This way there’s no room for the MPEG encoder to make estimations. Your “reds” are C60000h, which is, by definition, a washed out red. Pure red would be FF0000h (255,0,0). But we want to avoid completely saturated colors in video because most TV’s and displays handle them badly. I like to limit colors to 250, so my pure red would be FA0000h (250,0,0).

    Next, Hollywood avoids long diagonal lines of high contrast. They “jaggie” badly when encoded into MPG. When they do, there’s usually a similar color in the background to reduce the effect of the “unsharpen” process during encoding. Like a light pink background for a red line. You may not even notice the pink tint, but where the encoder is making edge decisions, it looks nicer when the transition is from two levels of the same color. (There’s no other color there to get mixed into the encoded line).

    Stephen Mann
    MannMade Digital Video
    San Jose, CA

  • Steve

    April 1, 2006 at 9:07 pm

    So bassicly, if i wanted to get better results, I would have no choice but re-renderring the motion backgrounds and the text composited with AE, so it’s not my renderring techinques that are bad. hum, well thank you very much, I guess it’s back to the drawing board for me.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy