Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects Kill shudder on horzontal movement. Interlace or Motion Blur?

  • Kill shudder on horzontal movement. Interlace or Motion Blur?

    Posted by Kevin Reiner on July 14, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    Smacking my head against a wall here.

    I have a :30 spot that is a constant pan of video boxes right to left with some text that moves with the video. Working in a ProRes 422 HQ comp. When I export progressive, it shudders like crazy in FCP. I tried motion blur to kill it, but that muddied up the text to much.

    So instead, I exported deinterlaced UFF and it looked great in FCP on our Flanders monitor. We then send that out to 5 local stations using their preferred video codec and size. Some take HD, some SD, some HD and then convert to SD and all of them in different formats. Big pain in the behind. Well, now I’m getting complaints that the spot looks bad on air. Don’t know what to do. Why would it look great on my broadcast monitor, but then look blurry on air? Not a newbie here, but feel like one.

    Any suggestions?
    -Kevin

    Mac Pro 2 x 3 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
    32GB Memory
    Dual-channel 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI Express card
    Dell Display (23″ flat panel)
    ATI Radeon HD 5770
    AJA Kona LSi SD/HD capture card
    Rourke 16 TB
    Flanders 2460

    SOFTWARE
    Mac OS X 10.6.5
    FCP 7
    After Effects CS5
    Boris Continuum
    Sapphire Plug Ins
    All Trapcode Plugs
    Zaxwerks Invig

    Kevin Reiner replied 14 years, 10 months ago 2 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Walter Soyka

    July 14, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    [Kevin Reiner] “I exported deinterlaced UFF and it looked great in FCP on our Flanders monitor.”

    I’m not sure why this would help… do you really mean deinterlaced UFF? Or did you mean that you rendered with fields, UFF? I could certainly see how that would help.

    You may want different renders for different deliverables: you can render 1080i29.97, 486i29.97, and 480i29.97 with fields, but you should render 720p59.94 progressively.

    [Kevin Reiner] “Why would it look great on my broadcast monitor, but then look blurry on air?”

    I see at least one reversed-field error during ads on my local cable carrier daily. It’s absolutely maddening.

    If you know what station the fuzzy ad aired on, you might try to talk to an engineer, but sadly, it doesn’t seem like image quality is of much concern for many local stations…

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Kevin Reiner

    July 14, 2011 at 6:49 pm

    Thanks Dave and Walter,

    You guys are great benefits to this forum.

    Let me clarify:

    1. All the video is 29.97 ProRes 422 (1920×1080) shot on Sony HDW f900
    2. I didn’t touch interpret footage.
    3. Comp is also 29.97 ProRes 422 (1920×1080)
    4. Videos are scaled and cropped randomly.
    5. I rendered with fields (upper field first).
    6. Also rendered a sidecropped 480i29.97 with fields (lower field first)for SD delivery.
    7. For delivery I have to provide:
    a. DVC Pro HD 1920 X 1080i
    b. mpeg2 both 1080i29.97 & 486i29.97
    c. .h264 both 1080i29.97 & 486i29.97

    The client has told me that the commercial looks bad on TV, but when I ask what channel? was it HD or SD? etc. they just say it looks bad. They don’t realize how many variables are involved here.

    And yes Dave, it judders. I always say shudders for some reason. I’ve killed judder before on similar moves, so its nothing new to me, but this one I can’t get past.

    Thanks for your help,
    Kevin

    PS Here’s a snippet of the video –

    judder problems

    Mac Pro 2 x 3 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
    32GB Memory
    Dual-channel 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI Express card
    Dell Display (23″ flat panel)
    ATI Radeon HD 5770
    AJA Kona LSi SD/HD capture card
    Rourke 16 TB
    Flanders 2460

    SOFTWARE
    Mac OS X 10.6.5
    FCP 7
    After Effects CS5
    Boris Continuum
    Sapphire Plug Ins
    All Trapcode Plugs
    Zaxwerks Invig

  • Kevin Reiner

    July 14, 2011 at 6:58 pm

    One note. I just checked my settings and it seems like when AE auto interprets footage, it is random on whether the clips are upper or lower. It has most of them set to lower and about 1/4 set to upper. I’m going to change all of them to upper and see if that helps at all. Is it worth clicking “preserve edges”?

    The thing is, it was usually the text that was most noticable, so I don’t know if this is the fix I’m looking for.

    Mac Pro 2 x 3 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
    32GB Memory
    Dual-channel 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI Express card
    Dell Display (23″ flat panel)
    ATI Radeon HD 5770
    AJA Kona LSi SD/HD capture card
    Rourke 16 TB
    Flanders 2460

    SOFTWARE
    Mac OS X 10.6.5
    FCP 7
    After Effects CS5
    Boris Continuum
    Sapphire Plug Ins
    All Trapcode Plugs
    Zaxwerks Invig

  • Kevin Reiner

    July 14, 2011 at 7:20 pm

    Hey Dave,

    The footage was shot at 29.97. I just started another render with all videos interpreted upper field. Rendering out upper field with slight motion blur. We’ll see how it goes. I’ve also scaled the text up slightly to avoid it getting too muddy.

    I use Episode for exporting final files. I have no idea what happens to those files once they get to the stations. Really what I’m looking for are some peers telling me that I’m on the correct track and that the stations need to look at their workflow. Do I need to tell them that the spots were rendered with fields?

    Thanks again for your time,
    -Kevin

    Mac Pro 2 x 3 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
    32GB Memory
    Dual-channel 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI Express card
    Dell Display (23″ flat panel)
    ATI Radeon HD 5770
    AJA Kona LSi SD/HD capture card
    Rourke 16 TB
    Flanders 2460

    SOFTWARE
    Mac OS X 10.6.5
    FCP 7
    After Effects CS5
    Boris Continuum
    Sapphire Plug Ins
    All Trapcode Plugs
    Zaxwerks Invig

  • Kevin Reiner

    July 19, 2011 at 1:11 pm

    After sending them a new file that I knew was exactly what they needed:

    station: It’s still looking weird.
    me: explain weird
    station: weird horizontal blurry lines
    me: thats due to the field rendering
    station: I tried getting rid of that by deinterlacing.
    me: no, don’t do that. It is supposed to be that way.
    station: well it doesn’t look right.
    me: have you looked at it on another monitor?
    station: just on mine
    me: is yours a broadcast monitor
    station: I’m on my laptop
    me: You have to view it on a broadcast monitor.

    20 mins later:

    station: yeah, its looking better now.

    ————

    ARGH. I love HD, but there are times that I really miss the simplicity of the BetaSP standard.

    Mac Pro 2 x 3 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon
    32GB Memory
    Dual-channel 4Gb Fibre Channel PCI Express card
    Dell Display (23″ flat panel)
    ATI Radeon HD 5770
    AJA Kona LSi SD/HD capture card
    Rourke 16 TB
    Flanders 2460

    SOFTWARE
    Mac OS X 10.6.5
    FCP 7
    After Effects CS5
    Boris Continuum
    Sapphire Plug Ins
    All Trapcode Plugs
    Zaxwerks Invig

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy