Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DSLR Video Juiced Link DT454 vs BeachTek DXA-SLA XLR for DSLR

  • Juiced Link DT454 vs BeachTek DXA-SLA XLR for DSLR

    Posted by Ben Edwards on May 6, 2011 at 10:57 am

    Hi, I am looking for a way of using my mics with my Canon 550D. I have several XLR microphones. I will be using Magic-lantern to turn of the camera preamps . So what I need it something with XLR connectors, preamps and a headphone output. I have found the following candidates:

    BeackTek DXA-SLA – https://www.beachtek.com/dxaslr.html
    Juiced Link DT454 – https://www.juicedlink.com/audio-preamps-mixers-etc-c-66/jl-cx231

    There is also a 4 XLR Juiced Link that sounds interesting. I guess you must have to balance some of the signals ive as there are only 2 outputs. As there are not proper individual EQ meters this sounds like a bad idea.

    Have people had experience with these, what do they reckon? Is there other solutions I should consider?

    Regards,
    Ben


    Ben Edwards – Freelance Filmmaker
    https://www.funkytwig.com

    Ben Edwards replied 13 years, 1 month ago 5 Members · 15 Replies
  • 15 Replies
  • Noah Kadner

    May 6, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    I’d also consider adding this to the mix-

    https://www.sounddevices.com/products/mixpre-d.htm

    Noah

    Unlock the secrets of 24p, HD and Final Cut Studio with Call Box Training. Featuring the Panasonic GH2 and Canon 7D.

  • Ben Edwards

    May 6, 2011 at 3:22 pm

    Looks really nice but costs around the same as the camera;). The other two are both around $300. If I need something top end I would hire. Just for my own projects/non broadcast.

    I know the original Betchbox was used by the BBC so I am inclined to go for the beatchtek solution.

    Regards,
    Ben


    Ben Edwards – Freelance Filmmaker
    https://www.funkytwig.com

  • Noah Kadner

    May 6, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    I’ve heard very conflicting reviews- some are saying that the Juicelink has quieter preamps than the Beachtek. That said I’ve noticed the finish/ergonomics are better on the Beachtek. Bottom line is either of those devices would do the job well for what you’re looking for.

    I only threw in the Sound Devices because not only is it way better pre amps than either but it also gives you a USB connection so you can connect XLR mics directly to a computer for high quality recording. But if it’s only for camera direct work- you’ll be good to go with the other 2.

    Noah

    Unlock the secrets of 24p, HD and Final Cut Studio with Call Box Training. Featuring the Panasonic GH2 and Canon 7D.

  • Ben Edwards

    May 6, 2011 at 4:02 pm

    Just had a look at the Jucelink website and it does not look like the juicedLink CX231 or the non phantom power version has headphone socket. So I guess its the Beacchtek one.


    Ben Edwards – Freelance Filmmaker
    https://www.funkytwig.com

  • Jason Jenkins

    May 6, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    Ben,

    I’m a big fan of the JuicedLink DT454. Very clean preamps and excellent customer service. Check out this thread for more info and a sample video: https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/280/5967

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

  • Brent Dunn

    May 6, 2011 at 6:11 pm

    I haven’t used the Beachtek, but I’ve read comments about loosing some of your bottom end on the audio.

    Why not use a zoom H4N recorder? It has XLR’s and you can patch it into your camera while recording a higher quality audio directly on the zoom.

    Brent Dunn
    Owner / Director / Editor
    DunnRight Films
    DunnRight Video.com
    Video Marketing Toolbox.net

    Sony EX-1,
    Canon 5D Mark II
    Canon 7D
    Mac Pro Tower, Quad Core,
    with Final Cut Studio

    HP i7 Quad laptop
    Adobe CS-5 Production Suite

  • Ben Edwards

    May 6, 2011 at 6:28 pm

    Is this the only one that allows monitoring through headphones?


    Ben Edwards – Freelance Filmmaker
    https://www.funkytwig.com

  • Noah Kadner

    May 6, 2011 at 6:58 pm

    Yeah I was going to say- double system sound gives you a lot better quality and simpler connection. At a cost of having to sync dailies in post- just like any real movie shot on film…

    Noah

    Unlock the secrets of 24p, HD and Final Cut Studio with Call Box Training. Featuring the Panasonic GH2 and Canon 7D.

  • Jason Jenkins

    May 6, 2011 at 8:36 pm

    [Noah Kadner] “Yeah I was going to say- double system sound gives you a lot better quality and simpler connection. At a cost of having to sync dailies in post- just like any real movie shot on film…”

    Technically, it’s better quality–but if you can’t hear the difference does it matter? Mic, mic placement, preamps and recording environment are going to have a much bigger impact on the end result than the file format.

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

  • Noah Kadner

    May 6, 2011 at 10:55 pm

    True but some of these cameras are truly awful in terms of their internal pre amps and circuitry and you will hear a difference. Here’s some more detailed analysis:

    https://inventorspot.com/articles/clearing_noise_part_i_shortfalls_capturing_dslr_audio

    https://www.studiodaily.com/blog/?p=3582

    -Noah

    Unlock the secrets of 24p, HD and Final Cut Studio with Call Box Training. Featuring the Panasonic GH2 and Canon 7D.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy