issius with luts

[Vegdo Rjabkov]

it is a .tiff that i took out of the video

[Vegdo Rjabkov]

Now i am speachless….

I i used the lut that was created with my Lightroom 6 (used on Mac)
and i used the lut that was created with Lightroom CC 2017 from the Windows PC of my brother

both luts extraced with john r. ellis lut loader.

now when i am using both of them i get the same result as in Lightroom……..

here the image to compare exported out of my lightroom 6

[Jeremy Garchow]

So the Lightroom 6 LUTs do not work, but Lightroom CC LUTs work?

[Vegdo Rjabkov]

NO, the CC lut looks diffrent to the Lightroom 6 lut. but wehen i use them together i get the same reslut.

now i installed lighroom cc 2017 also on my mac and all 3 luts looks diffrent …

[Jeremy Garchow]

[Vegdo Rjabkov] “now i installed lighroom cc 2017 also on my mac and all 3 luts looks diffrent …
“

It is hard to diagnose the problem as it seems that at some point, you have two LUTs on, and others, you have settings enabled in the LUT filter that will alter the look of the LUT (“Intensity” etc).

Is it possible to upload the original TIFF and LUT so I can see what it looks like here?

[Vegdo Rjabkov]

i cant upload the .tiff it is bigger than 50mb
here is the lut that i generated in lightroom, how i want the video to look like:
11912_lutforcreativcow.cube.zip

[Vegdo Rjabkov]

here you can download via rapidshare:
https://www.rapidshare.com.cn/WC2EVP5

and here is the picture how it should look like:

[Jeremy Garchow]

Sorry, can you also export your LR settings as a preset?

[Vegdo Rjabkov]

here it is
11913_creativcow.lrtemplate.zip

[Jeremy Garchow]

Thanks so much this helps.

When I go to export a LUT, it says that there are certain settings that won’t be transferred to the LUT, which is why you aren’t getting the expected result in FCPX.

See here:

If you turn those two parameters off, and use the Tone Curve to get a similar look, you will get a direct LUT transfer from Lightroom.