Activity › Forums › Avid Media Composer › isn’t anyone excited about AJA I/O Express and AVID ?
-
isn’t anyone excited about AJA I/O Express and AVID ?
Job Ter burg replied 15 years, 3 months ago 7 Members · 18 Replies
-
Mario Rubertis
February 16, 2011 at 6:52 pmWilliam,
I use the Matrox MXO2 and not too long ago go an MXO2LE with the H.264 option built in, using it primarily with FCP, but I came from AVID. I’m on this forum hoping that AVID would turn on the power of my Matrox box or at least give me a clue 🙁
Before buying the LE, I did my research and compared it to the ioExpress. I found for my needs that the MXO2LE with H.264 was the better buy…why…..
– Analog input for my legacy equipment/clients with tape
– More audio in and out (balanced)
– Up conversion from my SD clips
– 8 tracks of HDMI audio for surround sound
– Matrox HDMI calibration utility
– H.264 accelerationJust wanted to offer another point of view, I hope this helps. So I guess I’ll wait for AVID to announce the support for MXO2 LE before returning to Media Composer!
An Artist At Heart.
Life is made of moments… -
Hector Berrebi
February 16, 2011 at 7:06 pm[Job ter Burg] “Biggest bummer: limited project types are supported. No film rates in SD, for instance. https://cdn.pinnaclesys.com/SupportFiles/attach/HW-Capabilities_Public_1.0.p...”
interesting link… very thorough where did you find it?
hector
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
Job Ter burg
February 16, 2011 at 7:28 pmThe MC 5.5 FAQ page holds a link to the Io Express FAQ which links to this.
https://avid.custkb.com/avid/app/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=389915 -
Hector Berrebi
February 16, 2011 at 7:38 pm[Job ter Burg] “The MC 5.5 FAQ page holds a link to the Io Express FAQ which links to this.
https://avid.custkb.com/avid/app/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=389915“
and now the page is gone and link is dead
too bad, it was a good comparison…
Job, did you happen to save a copy of the PDF before the link died?
would be happy to have a copy
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
Job Ter burg
February 16, 2011 at 9:08 pmDon’t have a copy on this computer.
However, my guess is they found some mistakes in there, and are updating the file. Mind you, this is a very fresh release, and documents are being updated and completed as they are working towards a March release. -
Jon Bagge
February 16, 2011 at 10:13 pmMC is 64 bits. this version will be the last to work on 32 bit system.
No, MC is 32 bits, including the new version 5.5. Future versions (MC6?) will be 64 bits.
You can run 32 bit programs on 64 bit OS’s, but not the other way around.
————–
http://www.jonbagge.net
Jon Bagge – Editor – London, UK
Avid – FCP – After Effects -
Hector Berrebi
February 17, 2011 at 8:42 am[Jon Bagge] “No, MC is 32 bits, including the new version 5.5. Future versions (MC6?) will be 64 bits.
You can run 32 bit programs on 64 bit OS’s, but not the other way around.”
i stand corrected… not sure how i got this confusing info stuck in my head…
at least they give us a road map sort of info, next version is 64 bit 🙂
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
Job Ter burg
February 17, 2011 at 7:28 pmIndeed, vs 1.1 is up there now:
https://avid.custkb.com/avid/app/selfservice/search.jsp?DocId=390851
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up