Activity › Forums › DaVinci Resolve › HP Dreamcolor Gamma setting?
-
HP Dreamcolor Gamma setting?
Posted by Andrew Smith on September 28, 2011 at 8:23 pmHello
I am hoping to find a fellow Dreamcolor user to help me make an adjustment.
I am trying to change the Gamma on my Dreamcolor which is set to rec. 709, 6500, etc just need to have access to changing to 2.2 from 2.4.
I will have a professional calibrator come in and probe it to match my panny plasma as well – set it right to rec.709 but I cant seem to figure out how to change the Gamma which seems to be an important value to be bale to adjust no?! I just updated the firmware to the latest version but that did not help – still cant seem to change from 2.4 to anything else – I am sending a 10 bit signal via DisplayPort from an HDLINK3D & Extreme 3D.
Any help would be great!
MacPro 4,1 OSX 10.6.8 / FCS3 / CS5
2.26 ghz 8-core / 24GB RAM
Nvidia GT 120/285 comboAndrew Smith replied 14 years, 8 months ago 4 Members · 17 Replies -
17 Replies
-
Kevin Cannon
September 28, 2011 at 9:17 pmHey Andrew, are you using the Dreamcolor APS and Dreamcolor probe? The gamma option usually pops up in the advanced page once you’ve selected the monitor as 2480zx…
One weird thing about it, the Dreamcolor must be connected via USB for the advanced page to show up, even if you aren’t otherwise plugging USB devices in… Unless they’ve changed it, there’s no warning to tell you that you’re missing out on the advanced page…
KC
Prehistoric Digital
PhD Grading Suite -
Andrew Smith
September 29, 2011 at 2:30 amHey Kevin,
I am on a mac system so i had to lug over a friends pc tower just to be able to update the firmware…i did not download or use any of the other stuff since it would require using the pc to adjust etc, and no i do not use a probe because i had been doing it by eye and now i have a calibration expert coming to me to probe both the dreamcolor AND my plasma to match rec. 709 – sounds like what you are saying is that I need that application to launch from the pc in order to change the gamma to 2.2?
can you explain in any further detail about this?
thank you
MacPro 4,1 OSX 10.6.8 / FCS3 / CS5
2.26 ghz 8-core / 24GB RAM
Nvidia GT 120/285 combo -
Kevin Cannon
September 29, 2011 at 3:48 amYeah, the Advanced Profiling Solution works with the Dreamcolor probe, and as far as I know it’s the only way to manage certain aspects of the Dreamcolor color management… the good news is, it’s available for your Mac, so no need to lug a PC over to work with it… the bad news is it’s an extra 350 bucks.
But talk to your calibration person, mine once told me that the probe is specific to the Dreamcolor because there there is a physical difference between it and other xrite probes (some filtration) and that he needed to use that software and probe alongside his non-contact probe in order to get at all the controls. Things might have changed though, I switched to an FSI about a year ago…
KC
Prehistoric Digital
PhD Grading Suite -
Andrew Smith
September 29, 2011 at 4:10 amoh man you would think the guy would have said something about this when i mentioned the Dreamcolor…however after looking thru each of the downloading on HP’s driver page i think the HP Display Assistant Utility is the software that might allow me access to changing Gamma and correct me if i am wrong but this does not require the probe to use?
Maybe if i try that and can change the gamma to 2.2 (like the FSI default rec. 709 shipping setup) then hopefully he can have enough control of settings on the monitor itself to get it calibrated with his probe’s.
Just curious – onyour FSI did you leave it as 2.2 rec. 709 or do you switch to other settings when doing film or web stuff not needing rec. 709 specs?
thanks for you input – really makes me sick of dealing with the Dreamcolor – needles to say the tech support is terrible compaired to FSI 🙂
here is a link to what I am talking about…hopefully if i launch this software i can adjust the gamma for rec.709 which is not adjustable on my monitor it seems.
-
Kevin Cannon
September 29, 2011 at 4:51 amPossibly there’s another way… that’s just how I used to do it. The tech support from HP is a nightmare. You probably already determined this, but basically nobody in the company is aware that the product even exists… I actually went through 6 different displays because nobody seemed to know or care about the quality issues, they were just willing to pay for shipping for a replacement… SIX TIMES. I still have the last one, it’s about to go onto an assistant station…
For the FSI and the projector I use 2.2 for Rec. 709 material, sometimes DCI at 2.6.
KC
Prehistoric Digital
PhD Grading Suite -
Andrew Smith
September 29, 2011 at 12:41 pmyeah its SO bad, you might as well have purchased it from some shady company in china or wherever – i cant wait to be able to afford an FSI 10 bit monitor or OLED once it catches some more traction in the market just to not have to deal with the HDLINK box and HP issues – it is very much not a ‘confidence’ monitor 🙂
MacPro 4,1 OSX 10.6.8 / FCS3 / CS5
2.26 ghz 8-core / 24GB RAM
Nvidia GT 120/285 combo -
Andrew Smith
September 29, 2011 at 1:39 pmJust to clarify – did you leave it on rec.709 gamma 2.4 when you were using it? i seem to not be able to change gamma with this software either…will try the APS now but i imagine without the probe it wont allow me to do anything…
MacPro 4,1 OSX 10.6.8 / FCS3 / CS5
2.26 ghz 8-core / 24GB RAM
Nvidia GT 120/285 combo -
Knut Jansohn
September 29, 2011 at 2:28 pmHi,
sorry but I have to say:
Gamma 2,4 is the right gamma to display rec 709 (2,35 is recommended by EBU).
There is no need to change in this case!Regards
Knut
-
Kevin Cannon
September 29, 2011 at 3:48 pmHere’s a good thread on the lack of standards for Rec 709 gamma, whether you go with 2.4 or 2.35, or 2.2, it’s good to be able to change it: https://mobi.creativecow.net/thread/286/157#162
KC
Prehistoric Digital
PhD Grading Suite -
Knut Jansohn
September 29, 2011 at 5:18 pmThanks for the interesting link.
A quote from the EBU-tech3320:
“The television system has been deliberately designed with an end-to-end system gamma of about 1.2, to provide compensation for the ‘dim surround’ effect [6]. Therefore the Tech 3320 User requirements for Video Monitors in Television Productionmonitor gamma is not, and never has been, the inverse of the camera gamma.”I guess that’s within the meaning of the creators of Rec 709.
But anyway – if your clients like to watch a display gamma 2.2, you better switch your dislay to 2.2
Regards
Knut
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up