Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects How to achieve this effect?

  • How to achieve this effect?

    Posted by Tony Bartolucci on May 30, 2006 at 1:04 am

    I was watching a National Geographic show the other day and they were talking about Tigers. They showed the tiger walking (actual video footage) then as they were talking about the tigers muscles and heart it some how switch to this “inside view” of the tiger. Where they were showing its muscles, heart, and other organs, but it wasn’t just a 3d model, there was no change in the surrounding video footage, you could still see the grass and how the tiger was moving…. Anyone know what I’m talking about?

    Criis Daw replied 20 years ago 6 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Simon Carlson-thies

    May 30, 2006 at 1:15 am

    I didn’t see it but I would guess it was something like this:

    It probably was 3D tiger from the inside that was tracked onto the video footage and they may have gone as far as to roto out the orignal tiger after matching the motion and placing a clean plate to fill in and comping in the insides of the tiger.

    Simon Carlson-Thies,
    Digital Light Graphics And Animation

  • Tony Bartolucci

    May 30, 2006 at 1:21 am

    makes sense, I’m gong to see if I can find a clip and post a link.

    I’m hoping that someone who has seen what I’m talking about will be able to add some insight.

  • Justin Productions

    May 30, 2006 at 1:51 am

    Maybe it was all done in 3D. You’d be stuned how 3D can be realistic today. I’ve watched a film in IMAX not a long time ago, a films about animals in the jungle, and if I haven’t knew it was all made in 3D, never I would of guessed.

    So…maybe, maybe not 😉

    Justin Productions
    Tangerin01@hotmail.com
    Adobe After Effects 6.5 Professional

  • Tony Bartolucci

    May 30, 2006 at 1:53 am

    I’m in the process of getting a clip now, but I probably wont be able to post it until tomorrow….

    That being said I will probably create a new thread and post the link this time, because I fear that this thread will be lost waiting till tomorrow…

  • Andrei Firtich

    May 30, 2006 at 8:21 am

    Well it all depends on the shot, if the camera was static it could have been possibly done in AE, most likely it was done in 3d app and then composited in AE. As for as the whole thing being a full 3d render, I don’t think people realize how much effort and rendering time it takes to make photorealistic full scene render…it is a lot simpler to make a small render and then composite it to video or AE/Combustion scene. As far as using 3d tracking in my experience it is royal pain in the butt, ofcourse I have only used Synth Eyes 3d, maybe Benjouir makes it faster/easier.
    Just my 2 cents

  • Tony Bartolucci

    May 30, 2006 at 5:01 pm
  • Shawn Rossi

    May 30, 2006 at 7:55 pm

    After viewing the example I can say it was a mixture of 3D and 2D overlays to achieve that effect. I can see evidence of texture stretching in some of the three-quarter cheetah shots with the muscles, which would indicate 3D. There are other things that lead me to believe this was a 2D/3D combo.

    You would start with a clean plate of the video footage and overlay 3D and/or 2D over top. It’s not hard to rotoscope the 3D elements over the footage in many 3D apps. It’s just time consuming. One of the best mid-range priced tracking solutions is Boujou Bullet (https://www.2d3.com/html/products/boujoubullet_overview.html)

    I worked with this workflow on a Ford spot that needed tracking of 3D elements seamlessly. Footage > Boujou Bullet > Softimage|XSI > Rendered Plates/Mattes/Frames > After Effects over Footage > Final Output.

    Cheers!
    |rossimo|

  • Criis Daw

    May 31, 2006 at 8:04 pm

    i beleive its done with an xray lens fitted to the camera….
    you can get them these days

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy