Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Firewire DV Vs SDI Uncompressed
-
Firewire DV Vs SDI Uncompressed
Posted by Sean Davison on July 19, 2005 at 11:39 amShould I use my Cinewave SDI set up to on Line a Programme shot on DV and DVCam or will the quality of the picture be as good using Firewire?
Does the same apply to DVC ProHD?
Graeme Nattress replied 21 years, 1 month ago 3 Members · 2 Replies -
2 Replies
-
Walter Biscardi
July 19, 2005 at 12:05 pmIf your mastering output is DV or DVCPro, then use Firewire and edit in an DV / DVCPro timeline and master to tape.
If your mastering output is an uncompressed format like BetaS, DigiBeta, etc… then capture via SDI using the 8bit Uncompressed capture preset and edit in an 8bit timeline, then use SDI to master to tape.
Walter Biscardi, Jr.
Creative Genius, Biscardi Creative Media
https://www.biscardicreative.comNow in Production, “The Rough Cut,” https://www.theroughcutmovie.com
“I reject your reality and substitute my own!” – Adam Savage, Mythbusters
-
Graeme Nattress
July 19, 2005 at 12:12 pmAnd for the proof:
https://www.nattress.com/Chroma_Investigation/chromasampling.htm
Although BetaSP is about as far below “uncompressed” as DV is, it certainly benefits from the rendering in FCP not going back to the DV codec as it avoids the mixing of BetaSP and DV artifacts, and that also implies that if you want to keep a master copy for yourself, you’re far better off mastering to DV than BetaSP, and best still mastering to Digital Betacam, which although not uncompressed, is very lightly compressed and is certainly visually lossless in it’s compression.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up