Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations FCPX offers what advantages over Premiere?

  • FCPX offers what advantages over Premiere?

    Posted by Chris Frantz on January 27, 2015 at 12:27 am

    I can think of a couple, but they’re all pretty minor in comparison to all that Adobe is doing right.

    Timeline index, but I believe Premiere has something similar.
    The skimmer, I’ve really grown to enjoy this actually. Why not have two play heads?
    Speed remapping, is slightly better in FCPX due to the auto-ramps it generates.
    Having crop as a part of the inspector, but premiere could add this in a moment.
    Waveforms that respond when you key frame them. It’s a cool option, but there should be a way to turn it off.

    That’s all I can think of, anyone else?

    Walter Soyka replied 11 years, 3 months ago 16 Members · 32 Replies
  • 32 Replies
  • Charlie Austin

    January 27, 2015 at 12:48 am

    Is this a new trend in topics? lol Here’s one…

    It’s more fun to cut in and I spend less time swearing at it and more time trying crazy editorial stuff than any other NLE I use.

    Too subjective? 🙂 OK, well…

    Filmstrip view in Event Browser
    Browser in general, way easier to find stuff
    Live, real time preview of all audio and video filters/FX
    Much better audio plugins *in the app*
    Really great 3rd party ecosystem
    no tracks
    the inspector, warts and all
    clip skimming
    snapshots
    keywords, collections, smart collections
    share destinations/bundles
    really great compositing/title stuff built in
    retiming/color matching/audio fixes are really nice, and can easily be amped up via 3rd parties
    magnetic timeline. really really fast trimming of cuts to time etc
    compound clips (not nests!)
    cleaner UI
    quicker access to setting for audio configs, video settings
    live waveforms
    embedded audio, access to components in *any* clip including masters
    No Tracks… oh, did i say that?
    Generators, built in and from Motion
    No mode switching for subframe editing

    gotta work… I’ll add more… 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • John Davidson

    January 27, 2015 at 12:49 am

    The media browser. The ability to build motion template filters and effects is pretty amazeballs too. Does premiere let you publish directly to Youtube or Vimeo from within the application?

    John Davidson | President / Creative Director | Magic Feather Inc.

  • Chris Frantz

    January 27, 2015 at 12:58 am

    Yep, premiere now does let you publish to those sources via media encoder (which is easy to do with a batch export, wink wink).

    The motion template is cool, but the only time I’ve ever used the custom one is to create a batch lower thirds or slate. You can use ae projects and publish them with text you can manipulate in Premiere. Most other effects are just workarounds for things you can do natively in Premiere (adjustment layers anyone?).
    Premiere has a pretty fantastic media browser as well, I might even say a better one as you can have multiple open and explore all kinds of different media types.

  • Charlie Austin

    January 27, 2015 at 1:17 am

    [Chris Frantz] “Premiere has a pretty fantastic media browser as well, I might even say a better one as you can have multiple open and explore all kinds of different media types.”

    It’s awful, and to be fair, it’s not just Premiere. Anything that requires you to have multiple panes open, bins upon bins upon bins really just pales in comparison. Open a bin with hundreds of sound effects, and find a few options that have real sharp attacks, a quick peak, and then tail out. In filmstrip view in X I can find them all in about 30 seconds just by looking at the waveforms. Anything else… preview everything.

    Find the shot of a clock face that is “somewhere” in one of 6 reels in one of 3 versions of feature. Again, 30 seconds in X. In anything else you’ll be scrubbing through everything and hoping you don’t miss it. You may need to play it all in FF.

    Totally different league

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Bradley Jones

    January 27, 2015 at 1:21 am

    I can think of a few outside of the ones you’ve mentioned.

    *A mezzanine codec for proxy and optimized workflow (Both NLE’s have a de-bayering option but proxy can make editing in remote locations very easy).

    *Auditions are a very unique and handy feature for X

    *Smart Collections: Adobe just mimicked this with search bins but they are not nearly as powerful and robust as the smart collections in X.

    *Round tripping with Resolve: While both NLE’s can roundtrip with Resolve just fine, with the latest updates X has a few advantages as far as translating speed changes, keyframes and even some plugin effects.

    *The Plugin world around X: This is huge, because they built X around Cocoa releasing a giant plugin market that sprang up overnight not to mention the custom templates you can publish via Motion. Anywhere Apple is lacking, this market fills in the gaps.

    *Keyword Collections: Another, very powerful way to organize media around metadata that is far more robust that the classic bin structure.

    *Storyboards: Being able to pre-biz an entire film using placeholders before you ever step foot on set is a great feature.

    *The Magnetic Timeline: This is maybe a matter of taste, but once you master the magnetic timeline the speed and ease of editing can be greatly improved. The fact you don’t have to worry about throwing clips out of sync is a huge deal. There are still some advantages to track based editing but those are few and far between.

    There’s advantages and disadvantages to both, I edit with both NLE’s and I’ve slowly fallen in love with X. Premiere is a better all rounder but X is so forward looking that despite a handful of shortcomings, just makes editing a far more pleasurable experience.

  • Chris Frantz

    January 27, 2015 at 1:24 am

    I’m not sure why you would have a single bin with 100’s of SFX not organized any more than that, that seems like a FCPX problem where there’s only a few layers of organization. Events, folders, keyword collections. 😉

  • Charlie Austin

    January 27, 2015 at 1:28 am

    [Chris Frantz] “I’m not sure why you would have a single bin with 100’s of SFX not organized any more than that, that seems like a FCPX problem where there’s only a few layers of organization. Events, folders, keyword collections. ;)”

    I don’t. I have a library that has thousands of SFX all nicely organized with KW collections. I have the same “project”, with the exact same structure using bins which I use in Pr and FCP 7. It’s so much easier for me to find things in X even with the detailed organization. Not even close.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Chris Frantz

    January 27, 2015 at 1:53 am

    Filmstrip view in Event Browser > Options to zoom in on waveforms in Premiere, none in FCPX
    Browser in general, way easier to find stuff > Subjective, Premiere has more metadata options as well as more organizational options.
    Live, real time preview of all audio and video filters/FX > This is one! I’ve never tried it with the audio, never occurred to me. Might have to give that a go.
    Much better audio plugins *in the app* > Subjective, metering options are better in Premiere.
    Really great 3rd party ecosystem > There’s less stuff missing in Premiere 😉
    no tracks > I’ll leave this be
    the inspector, warts and all > Premiere has something similar “Effect controls”
    clip skimming > Premiere has this in a few places but no skimmer in the timeline
    snapshots > Duplicating sequences, advanced versioning, etc. are all on par
    keywords, collections, smart collections > Smart collections are much like smart searches which premiere has. Keyword collections are nice 🙂
    share destinations/bundles > Send to media encoder, same deal
    really great compositing/title stuff built in > Titling is better in FCPX, but I do most titles in AE regardless of the NLE, I think most people do. You can edit your AE project text in Premiere btw.
    retiming/color matching/audio fixes are really nice, and can easily be amped up via 3rd parties > Retiming is great, Premiere has the retiming tool which is pretty effective but FCPX wins this one IMO.
    magnetic timeline. really really fast trimming of cuts to time etc > This can be replicated pretty quickly in Premiere, and also comes with the option of not having everything ripple.
    compound clips (not nests!) > I guess, but you can have a nested timeline open simultaneously while editing in your primary one in Premiere which eliminates any advantage FCPX might have. Maybe not though, what else am I missing?
    cleaner UI > You can move UI elements in Premiere. It can quickly become cleaner or messier than anything else. And it doesn’t come with a magic wand icon which is a plus for me.
    quicker access to setting for audio configs, video settings > I guess, but it’s a matter of a click or a remapped keyboard shortcut in Premiere.
    live waveforms > This is cool in FCPX, but something tells me it’s what contributes to all of FCPX’s waveform lag. They have to redraw all the time as a result.
    embedded audio, access to components in *any* clip including masters > Explain further?
    No Tracks… oh, did i say that? > Heh
    Generators, built in and from Motion > All available in Premiere, well they don’t have blobs or bubbles I guess…
    No mode switching for subframe editing > It’s a click away.

    I won’t bother with listing the Premiere pro’s I think that thread underneath us is doing that better than I could.

  • Charlie Austin

    January 27, 2015 at 2:10 am

    [Chris Frantz] “I won’t bother with listing the Premiere pro’s I think that thread underneath us is doing that better than I could.”

    Well, you should use Premier then. I’ll defer to your years of experience.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Jim Wiseman

    January 27, 2015 at 2:17 am

    [Charlie Austin] “Is this a new trend in topics? lol Here’s one…

    It’s more fun to cut in and I spend less time swearing at it and more time trying crazy editorial stuff than any other NLE I use.

    Too subjective? 🙂 OK, well…

    etc.,etc…

    You must be holding it right!

    Jim Wiseman
    Sony PMW-EX1, Pana AJ-D810 DVCPro, DVX-100, Nikon D7000, Final Cut Pro X 10.1.4, Final Cut Studio 2 and 3, Media 100 Suite 2.1.5, Premiere Pro CS 5.5 and 6.0, AJA ioHD, AJA Kona LHi, Blackmagic Ultrastudio 4K, Blackmagic Teranex, Avid MC, 2013 Mac Pro Hexacore, 1 TB SSD, 64GB RAM, 2-D500: 2012 Hexacore MacPro 3.33 Ghz 24Gb RAM GTX-285 120GB SSD, Macbook Pro 17″ 2011 2.2 Ghz Quadcore i7 16GB RAM 250GB SSD

Page 1 of 4

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy