Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro FCP X Auto-conforming footage: proper 3:2 pulldown insertion?

  • Nate Weaver

    June 24, 2011 at 9:15 pm

    Guys, I’m confused where you’re coming from.

    Last night I exported a 1080/29.97i “Project” with a 1080/23.98P clip inside it and it exported it perfectly with 2:3 interlaced pulldown.

    Just NOW, I made a 720/59.94P “Project”, put a 1080/23.98P clip inside it, and exported that.

    The resulting 720/59.94P Quicktime had the correct repeating cadence, 2 solid repeating frames followed by 3 solid repeating frames, then followed by 2, then 3. Over and over again. On a constant speed panning shot so I can see it with my eyes as well, it’s smooth.

    It all seems to work for me, and I understand clearly what the issue was with FCP7 as I had to go out of my way to do it correctly many times in other programs.

    Nate Weaver
    Director/D.P., Los Angeles
    https://www.nateweaver.net

  • Tony Silanskas

    June 24, 2011 at 10:44 pm

    You’re right Nate. Just exported another 720/59.94 clip and it’s correct. Whew! My mind just thought it saw it wrong last night since it’s so used to it in FCP 7. =)

    And when you were talking about 30p issues I read that backwards, as in putting 29.97 footage in 23.98. That’s when you need a Teranex. And I tested a 23.98 clip in a 30p timeline in FCP X and it’s correct, too, just like Gary mentioned.

    Think I need to get some sleep.

    tony

    http://www.HungryCliff.com

  • Nate Weaver

    June 25, 2011 at 12:20 am

    >And when you were talking about 30p issues I read that backwards, as in putting 29.97 footage in 23.98. That’s when you need a Teranex.

    Actually, the Terenex does a horrible job of this. 3 years ago I directed a concert in 30P, and then 5 months later they did a theatrical release of it via DCI.

    We did tests for a week. Compressor’s Motion Compensated frame rate conversion won. The Terenex looked awful. The 90 minute render took 48 hours. 🙂

    Nate Weaver
    Director/D.P., Los Angeles
    https://www.nateweaver.net

  • Tony Silanskas

    June 25, 2011 at 12:40 am

    [Nate Weaver] “The 90 minute render took 48 hours. :)”

    Sounds about right. Not that I love Compressor, but it can do a good job sometimes, even if it takes it jolly ‘ol time. Sad to hear about your issues with Terenex.

    tony

    http://www.HungryCliff.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    July 7, 2011 at 8:43 pm

    Just tried this myself, and FCPx does this correctly in a 1080i program.

    You have to go up to the little light switch in the playback window, then choose from the drop down menu under Display > Show both fields. You will then see what looks like squiggly lines of bad interlace, but if you set the playback window to 100%, it’s clean 3:2 interlaced pulldown.

    Jeremy

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy