-
extract a numerical value from another layer…
comp("comp1").layer("master").content("Shape 1").content("Path 1").pathI have a shape thats being distorted by an expression. I have other shapes that are using the first shape’s path as their own via an expression on their path (see code)
When I move the vertex points of the master path, the others follow suit.
I now want to use some expressions to distort the master path, but the expression doesn’t alter the path’s actual vertex values so the other layers don’t follow…
another example, if i do a simple wiggle expression on a shape’s position, is there a way to extract the shape’s altered position? is there a way to see the wiggle on the graph for instance?
thanks in advance for any advice 🙂
-
5 Replies
-
There’s a small curve-like icon between to the “=” and the pick-whip “@” icon if you add an expression. Toggling this will show the post-expression-values in the graph-editor instead of the keyframed values.
If you do a simple pick whip-expression from one property to another, you’ll always get the post-expression value. So just add a deform to the other paths and pickwhip to the first one.
-
thats exactly what i was searching for 🙂 thanks so much!
-
ok, i guess that works for parameters such as position, rotation, etc, but not for a path that is being deformed by an animation preset…
am i out of luck on this one then?
-
Yeah,
The result of an expression is normally a number,a string, or an array.
So there are a few things you can keyframe but not script: the colorwheel of colorama, the all in one property of levels, the curves property of the curves effect, and sadly: mask and shape paths.
Arguably these things could be described by arrays, or a javascript object, but adobe doesn’t support this. -
I guess what i am referrong to is, for example, if you apply the animation preset “wiggle – gelatin” to a shape, it alters the path of that shape eith expressions through a deform effect… there isn’t a way to get the result of the expressions applied to the shape’s path, I don’t think…
I am fguring out some workarounds though, but it would have been much easier if I could just extract the resulting deformation. there are lots of deformation/transformation effects that change the shape or position of something, but then you’re left with its pre-effect shape instead of the resulting shape…
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up