-
EDL Workaround Idea For FCP To Media100
As a work around for me being able to off line edit on FCP and send an edit decision list (EDL) to a Media100 for online, I have this question. From my thread readings here (which has thoroughly confused me on the topic!) I believe I read that you can “re wrap” the QT files created by FCP’s ingest process back into MXF files with now the new QT metadata from the off line edit (new file/clip names, etc.) included which would allow the Media100 to “see” the same file name corresponding with the QT file created and the EDL. As it is now, when I generate the QT file, it changes the file name from the original MXF file name.
If “re wrapping”, my editor is saying the problem with that is that FCP created the QT file in a 720 x 480 format instead of the 720 x 486 format, which I need for broadcast. Although he says “everybody’s doing it now,” he also says there IS a quality loss in the picture and noticeable.
So, is this possible, and are his concerns about picture degradation accurate?
Support notes:
1- We cannot get the XML output file to talk to each other. That’s not an option unless someone here wants to challenge our method and solve that issue (which might be the answer to the work around.)
2- I prefer not to add the original MXF file name in a comments field for manual reference in the EDL, as I will have over 600 edits or more in this thing and it will cost me a fortune in editor time to reference.)I hope this problem makes since to you guys and you are motivated to respond, because I’m at my wits end on this, and this seems to be my last work around idea.
Thank you in advance.
Wherever I am…I’m lost!