-
dynamic trimming.
-
I keep meaning to post a before and after side by side of a warp stabilized shot we used on some octocopter drone shots.
It went from unusable to gimbaled in no time. It kinda blew my mind a bit.
-
[Aindreas Gallagher] “Also – seriously – has anyone really tried the warp stabiliser here, because that thing is crazy good. I mean outright surreal good.”
Yes, I first started to rely on it in AE. When Adobe added it to PPro, I was over the moon. You’re right, WS is insanely good.
Shawn
-
[Steve Connor] “[Aindreas Gallagher] “Also – seriously – has anyone really tried the warp stabiliser here, because that thing is crazy good. I mean outright surreal good. ”
Used it on a shot last week, it’s stunning!”
If you guys like Warp Stabilizer, you owe it yourselves to try Core Melt’s Lock & Load X. Free demo, well worth the $99 and works in AE, Pr, and FCPX. Don’t get me wrong, I think Warp Stabilizer is awesome. But believe it or not, Lock & Load is even awesomer! Really!
_______________________
David Lawrence
art~media~design~research
propaganda.com
publicmattersgroup.com
facebook.com/dlawrence
twitter.com/dhl -
there is a brilliant IV out there (somewhere) maybe PVC?? where they 20 minute interview the guys about the R+D that went into Warp Stabiliser.
Its flat out stunning. The kind of calculation fallback scenarios they built in from the full blown planar analysis it is doing on parallax is just mind bending.
the coptor shots I got for a BTS car thing – its crazy what it could do with the info coming in – ditto dodgy dollys on a heavy camera for sony product shots.
IMHO – in software, Adobe have real, absolute, swiss watchmaker moments.
I’ve said this before – but if the market provides them shareholder revenue focus on non-linear editing – which is happening, we could end up with some incredibly serious stuff.
Adobe have boffins people. Basic R+D boffins coming out of their behinds.the implications of adobe anywhere are being investigated and absorbed by some pretty serious bods in London right now. I’m not even fully sure I get it on the ground as to how it actually plays out, but there is no way that adobe are not attempting to implement broad scale use. The impact for even small to mid range facilities is meant to be substantial.
Adobe appropriating resources to bear down directly on the NLE, with market reward, is a really, really, really good idea.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
for god’s sake please don’t muddy the message – I’m using WS to push broad scale PPro adoption.
Did you not get the memo?? Last week’s FCPX black flag meeting at white sands? Billl Davies was there.
Wait what did I say. Bill Davies is a stalwart proponent of FCPX. there.. are no triple agents.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
[Aindreas Gallagher] “or god’s sake please don’t muddy the message – I’m using WS to push broad scale PPro adoption.
Did you not get the memo?? Last week’s FCPX black flag meeting at white sands? Billl Davies was there.
Wait what did I say. Bill Davies is a stalwart proponent of FCPX. there.. are no triple agents.”
LOL! Alrighty then, Warp Stabilizer FTW! 🙂
_______________________
David Lawrence
art~media~design~research
propaganda.com
publicmattersgroup.com
facebook.com/dlawrence
twitter.com/dhl -
some people I swear… 😉
sheriously though – adobe boffins directed towards the NLE pretty full bore, with media content delivery spoils at issue – is a *pretty fab* idea.
plus – they’re not a willy wonka apple secrets factory, haven’t been for years.
we all know they’re working on stitching IV breaks for instance. It looks to be coming along pretty good too.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
[Aindreas Gallagher] “I think it allows a space for rapid in context iteration and analysis? It just feels like a concentrated space to consider the moment? Like ring a bell pause to noodle with the edit moment in motion?”
This.
For me, this way of working did change my way of seeing; and that new way of seeing made me a better overall editor, even when I use a mouse instead of the keyboard. I don’t think you need to dynamically trim to be a great editor, but I do think dynamically trimming can change how you see and how you think. Of course, YMMV.
_______________________
David Lawrence
art~media~design~research
propaganda.com
publicmattersgroup.com
facebook.com/dlawrence
twitter.com/dhl
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up