-
DSLR Organizational Headache
To set this up, I am not new to FCP, I’ve set up projects for numerous broadcast documentaries. Right now I’m working on a short documentary, shot entirely on the 5D at 29.97 with separate system sound. This is new territory and I want to make sure I’m that my approach makes sense.
The synching is all very straight forward and I’m not worried about that. What I’m worried about is the way I’m organizing my project. We are shooting upwards of 15 interviews for this project, which run about an hour each. Each interview is being shot with two cameras and I’ve been able to synch them with the separate sound easily. However, my problem lies in the fact that I need transcriptions and have no timecode from the cameras.
What I’ve done is create a few sequences for each interview (between 1 and 5) depending on how many times the sound man started and stopped the Audio. I’m treating each sequence as a “tape” in that I’ve named them using a convention like DB001A, DB001B, DB002A etc.. The timecode hour of each one matches the “tape” number. I’m exporting the sequences as quicktime reference movies and will use them in the edit project as the original media.
For transcription purposes I’m encoding these quicktimes with BITC and sending them to the transcriber. This way the transcription timecode matches the “tape” timecode, even though each of these quicktimes actually contains a stringout of several 5D clips. This creates a ton of new reference movies as I have an A and B angle of each interview.
Does this make sense? Am I creating a headache by using reference movies? My original files are not moving and I’m setup on a raid so I have redundancy if a drive goes down. Tapeless workflows make me really nervous so any help calming my nerves would be great.
Jeremy
