-
Covering Shadows That Are Not Suppose To Be In Frame
Posted by Debbie King on May 15, 2014 at 4:10 pmHello Everyone:
I have a dilemma. In quite a few of my frames, I see shadows of a person who is not suppose to be in frame. We used three cameras on this shoot, and it is the camera operator moving his hands an sometimes his head in frame.
I thought to create a separate track and then cookie cut the area where he is and then create a snap shot of it. Any advise?
There is also a door with a window where people are periodically looking in that is constantly in frame because the actors are standing in front of it. Sometimes their bodies cover the door and sometimes not.
I’m assuming this is a masking issue, but I only want to cover those areas. This can be complicated because the actors are standing and sitting to those areas.
Many thanks,
Debbie
Debbie King replied 12 years, 2 months ago 2 Members · 17 Replies -
17 Replies
-
Graham Bernard
May 16, 2014 at 2:19 amI understand Debbie. A real pain! Can you supply JPGs of the 3 situations?
1/- What you WANT
2/- People looking through DOOR
3/- Actors IN FRONT of door
Are these the 3 situs?
I’ve done a “Piece To Camera”. To one side of the Talent there was a Window Blind that was being gently moved by an updraft from the AirCon – ugh….. I employed masking to eradicate it. Now, yours is more complex, ‘cos of the actors moving in front of the door. But I’d like to have a go to suggest what could be done.
Grazie
Video Content Creator and Potter
PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge -
Debbie King
May 16, 2014 at 3:51 pmHi Grazie to the rescue. How are you?
Yes, my situation is very complicated. The most complicated one is the shadow to the right of the actor. The shot is static, but occasionally you’ll see the shadow of a hand, head or even camera.
I thought of the Jpeg idea and even went into Photoshop, cut out the portion that didn’t need to be seen and left the clear area of the wall where the shadow appears. I saved it as a snapshot and tried to place it over the frame in Sony Vegas. It didn’t work because the part that was transparent in Photoshop became a white background once I snapshot it. It covered the entire frame. So, now I am trying to work in After Effect to create a Prekey, but I need to find a scene where this shadowing does not happen so that I can create the Prekey to cover the area without covering the actors. The only issue with Prekeying is that it is transparent, and I still may see the shadow, but it’s worth a try.
Here’s a snapshot of the shadow issue, and the door too. I have resolved that the door is not as critical as the shadow, because it looks like people are looking in on the trial, although I would like to get rid of it. The shadow is really critical because no one else should be in frame.
Many thanks,
Debbie
-
Debbie King
May 16, 2014 at 11:18 pmHi Grazie:
I believe I solved the shadow issue. What I did was drop the clip into Photoshop and removed everything except the wall by using the quick select tool. Then I saved it as a PNG which kept it transparent.
I then dropped the file into Sony on the duplicate track above the clip and it covered everything. The only problem I had was that I could see the wall as a different color, because the rest of the file was transparent. So, I opened the file in Video/Crop and chose the mask square tool and made the square a little shorter than the mark. Then I feathered it. So what appears is a smooth transition between the colors which looks like it might be the lighting. I’m still working on it, but at least I minimized the shadow, which is very slight now.
I would suppose another dupe track would block out the shadow altogether.
I’m still working on the door issue. That’s definitely a challenge.
Many thanks,
Debbie
-
Graham Bernard
May 18, 2014 at 1:49 pm -
Debbie King
May 18, 2014 at 4:58 pmHi Grazie:
It’s better than what I came up with. How did you do it?
Many thanks,
Debbie
-
Graham Bernard
May 18, 2014 at 5:38 pmWould you like the VEG? What release of Vegas are you running?
Grazie
Video Content Creator and Potter
PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge -
Debbie King
May 18, 2014 at 6:01 pmYou did this in Vegas Pro alone? Really? I am running Vegas Pro 12.
I thought for sure I would have to work with a third party to get the opacity over the shadow. As mentioned, I tried Photoshop partial transparency by cutting the photo out and leaving just the wall in 100% opacity. Darkening the wall in levels and saving it as a PNG. My discovery is that even though it is opaque in Photoshop, by my saving it as a PNG, it makes the entire file transparent, which means that some of the shadow is still seen.
Many thanks,
Debbie
-
Graham Bernard
May 18, 2014 at 6:32 pm_______________________________________________________________
[Debbie King] “You did this in Vegas Pro alone? Really?”
_______________________________________________________________Yeah, really! It’s all there.
Here’s the VEG:-
7508_debbieshadowonwall1a.veg.zip
Video Content Creator and Potter
PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge -
Debbie King
May 18, 2014 at 9:24 pmHi Grazie:
I got it. What I did was go back into Photoshop cut out the picture and leave a very small portion of the wall. Then I went to fill and filled in the transparent space with the current content. I then saved it as a Jpeg and dropped into a separate video track in Sony to create a picture on top of picture effect. I went into the video/crop tool and positioned it over the shadow area. It was completely covered. Since this is not a solid color wall, the texture is a bit off, a little stretched. I think I can live with it. Since it still looks like a panel, I believe I can get away with it.
When I placed it over a duplicate video track it was superimposed and I could still see the shadow. When I used the other technique in my previous post, I could still see some of the shadow because it was a PNG which made the file transparent.
This technique the photo is 100% opaque that covers the shadow completely.
Many thanks,
Debbie
-
Debbie King
May 18, 2014 at 9:59 pmHi Grazie:
Thank you for the file. I have it open in Vegas now, and I see what you did. Amazing.
Many thanks,
Debbie
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up


