Could SIRI be used in Desktops?

[Jeremy Garchow]

[Andrew Richards] “Aside from going public for OS X in Lion when it was released (after being a private API in 10.6.7+), what do you mean by “ready”?”

Like, ready. For primetime. QT as it standa now is going to be no longer, developers are unsure of what the path to AVFoundation truly is. So, when will it be ready, Siri?

[Andrew Richards]

[Jeremy Garchow] “Like, ready. For primetime. QT as it standa now is going to be no longer, developers are unsure of what the path to AVFoundation truly is. So, when will it be ready, Siri?”

It isn’t ready now? I found you this information.

Best,
Andy

[Scott Sheriff]

[Jeremy Garchow] “…but what’s wrong with talking about it in a way that you don’t get accused of being a member of a suicidal cult? It is these new ideas that prevent intellectual suicide. Why is everyone so terrified?”

Jeez Jeremy sounds like your about one notch shy of Godwins Law.
What I find funny is that in your desire to talk about this, if the talk doesn’t go in a direction you like, or support some new whim of Apple, you resort to hyperbole and rhetoric. Is it that big of a deal that some don’t think this is all that handy, or can see flaws in the concept? In your desire to talk about things, try to remember not everyone has to adopt/buy every new thing that comes along just to prove their worthiness, and that pragmatism has it’s merits.

Scott Sheriff
Director
https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

“If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

Where were you on 6/21?

[Tim Wilson]

Scott, I agree that that post was way out of line, but I’d like to expand it beyond “disagreement with me = terrified.”

Add “disagreement = old man with his head up his ass, lack of vision/imagination, standing in the way of progress, etc.,” to “like it = brainwashed fan boy” to the list of inappropriate directions for conversations, even in this full-contact forum.

Just because it doesn’t have somebody’s name in it doesn’t mean it’s NOT a personal attack. This is worse in my mind. Instead of attacking one guy, it’s attacking an entire class of people, and it’s not okay.

So please, back up off of that stuff in either direction. NFL football is full-contact, but there are still rules. Here’ there’s only one rule, which I’ll remind everyone of again: talk about topics, not posters.

Yr pal,

Timmy
COW

[Don Walker]

By the way, I think CMX proposed a voice activated linear editor somewhere between the 3600 and the Omni. I don’t think it ever got to actual hardware at NAB, but I used to have some marketing material for it in my “collection”.
I think before voice operation we will see a well developed ipad version of FCPX, and I hope something similar for Android from Adobe. I think they would be useful even for the “Professional”.

don walker
texarkana, texas

John 3:16

[Jeremy Garchow]

Thanks, Andy, much appreciated. This is going to veer off topic.

I really would be curious as to what Siri says.

So why is everything still wrapped in QT in FCPX?

If someone wanted to build what used to be a QT component to send non QT wrapped media to be available to the OS, how would one do that in AV Foundation?

It doesn’t seem possible at this point, although maybe its now there and we have to wait.

What’s the “player” for av foundation?

[Jeremy Garchow]

[Scott Sheriff] “Jeez Jeremy sounds like your about one notch shy of Godwins Law.
What I find funny is that in your desire to talk about this, if the talk doesn’t go in a direction you like, or support some new whim of Apple, you resort to hyperbole and rhetoric. Is it that big of a deal that some don’t think this is all that handy, or can see flaws in the concept? In your desire to talk about things, try to remember not everyone has to adopt/buy every new thing that comes along just to prove their worthiness, and that pragmatism has it’s merits.”

If its not handy to you, why does the OP needs to be shunned to the corner?

This isn’t just about Apple, it’s about the bigger scope, just as Andrew Richards pointed out.

It’s not about telling FCPX to trim 5 frames, it’s about semantics, quite literally.

I don’t care if you disagree, I welcome disagreement. I’m just really tired of trying to talk about things intelligently and then someone says, I’m stupid or I follow a cult. I happen to like thinking about crazy ideas, it just do happens that Apple has a few on the table, and sometimes the logical implications of those ideas aren’t immediately clear. If Google built a new NLE that I happened to like, I’d talk about that too.

There have been plenty of conversations I have been involved in on this forum where disagreement abounds. We are all still friends and respect each other.

I’m sorry if you think I am approaching Godwin and his law, I don’t really know what it has to do with this.

[Kevin Patrick]

Sohrab had an idea he thought would be interesting to talk about.

It seemed like he was having a hard time finding someone who was interested in a constructive conversation.

I attempted to make light of all the negative (some of it 100%) feedback Sohrab was getting. I didn’t want to offend. So if I did, I’m sorry for that.

[Gary Huff]

[Jeremy Garchow] I’m sorry if you think I am approaching Godwin and his law, I don’t really know what it has to do with this.

How about refraining from typecasting people who don’t jump at every new little thing immediately out of the gate?

[Steve Connor]

[Jeremy Garchow] I’m sorry if you think I am approaching Godwin and his law, I don’t really know what it has to do with this.

How about refraining from typecasting people who don’t jump at every new little thing immediately out of the gate?

And maybe others could refrain from ridiculing people who put ideas up for discussion?

“My Name is Steve and I’m an FCPX user”