Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Broadcast quality

  • Broadcast quality

    Posted by Brandon Carter on July 8, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    I am producing a 30 minute program that airs on a national network. Currently all projects are entirely SD and shot on several different 1/3 and 1/2 inch chip cams. (Sony DSR 390) This footage is being uploaded through a Panasonic AG-DV2500 player via firewire onto a MACPRO (1.8 terabytes). Editing is done in FCPS2. Once all editing is down, we are recording back to mini dv tape and then sending off for conversion to Beta SP. When I watch my program on TV it is lacking quality in my opinion. It does not appear as sharp as it should be and just lacks overall picture quality. I am comparing it to other programs that are shot with much lesser cameras and the other shows appear to have better resolution/picture quality.

    Now I am wondering if I am capturing my footage at full quality, or if some other setting could be off. Or, could it be the method in which the company is converting my video to beta sp format?

    Russell Lasson replied 16 years, 10 months ago 11 Members · 46 Replies
  • 46 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    July 8, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    Well, if it is firewire, then you are capturing at full quality. But quality is dependant on a lot of things. how good the camera operators are, how well the footage was shot and exposed. Then the talent of the colorist…how well did they color the show? Was a broadcast monitor used to do this?

    And yes, the dubbing process from DV to betaSP…that can be a HUGE factor. If I were you, I’d look at your DV master compared to the betaSP master and see how they hold up.

    Plus, these other shows that were shot on lesser cameras…how do you know this? And they might have been captured in a higher quality format than DV…like uncompressed SD or ProRes or 1:1 if on Avid or DNxHD, and color corrected in a far better compression space, then output directly to digibeta or betaSP, with no quality loss due to losing a generation by dubbing DV to betaSP.

    There are many factors involved in the post process.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Russell Lasson

    July 8, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    I wouldn’t suggest making a BetaSP from a MiniDV tape. MiniDV is very compressed. Here are a couple of suggestions:

    1. Make your BetaSP master directly out of FCP. There are tons of places out there that you can send them a QT file and they’ll make your master for you.

    2. Master to ProRes. I’m not sure what your timeline is set up as, but ProRes is a great codec and will help maintain quality.

    3. Get a colorist to do a pass on your project. This is often over looked and a good colorist can really help to take your project to the next level.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Walter Biscardi

    July 8, 2009 at 6:56 pm

    [Brandon Carter] “Once all editing is down, we are recording back to mini dv tape and then sending off for conversion to Beta SP.”

    If it’s a broadcast show, you should be capturing / editing to 8bit Uncompressed SD or ProRes and going directly to BetaSP from that timeline. DV is killing your graphics quality and the overall product when you go back to DV tape has a softness to it. This is especially evident when you dub the tape from DV to BetaSP.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author.
    Credits include multiple Emmy, Telly, Aurora and Peabody Awards.
    Biscardi Creative Media

    Creative Cow Forum Host:
    Apple Final Cut Pro, Apple Motion, Apple Color, AJA Kona, Business & Marketing, Maxx Digital.

    Read my Blog!

  • Brandon Carter

    July 8, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    Ok..Thanks for all the replies. I think my major issue is the DV to Beta SP. I think my color is pretty decent, but the overall look of the broadcast is very soft…kinda like its just out of focus…. The company I am using now requires mini dv. However, I have a local company who will do it off an external hard drive. I think I am going to give that a try and see how it turns out.
    If anyone has more ideas I’m all ears!

  • Maurice Jansen

    July 8, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    hi brandon

    sorry to say but chosing DVcam as a production format al ready is living
    on the lower edge of broadcast quality (IMO already less then broadcast quality)
    already giving you so less data to work with in post.
    but good made DVcam footage can still kill poorly shot footage on the highest format.
    i don’t understand why you go back to miniDV how do you do this with timecode anyway???
    miniDV is consumer level like VHS in the early day’s
    just don’t.

    get your HQ quicktime to someone who has a deck and good IO

    greet
    Maurice

  • Walter Biscardi

    July 8, 2009 at 8:15 pm

    [Brandon Carter] “However, I have a local company who will do it off an external hard drive. I think I am going to give that a try and see how it turns out. “

    If it’s a DV file, it’s still going to be soft. Capture / Edit in Uncompressed or ProRes and you’ll have a better end product.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author.
    Credits include multiple Emmy, Telly, Aurora and Peabody Awards.
    Biscardi Creative Media

    Creative Cow Forum Host:
    Apple Final Cut Pro, Apple Motion, Apple Color, AJA Kona, Business & Marketing, Maxx Digital.

    Read my Blog!

  • Brandon Carter

    July 8, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Most of my footage is being shot with a Sony DSR 390L with Fujinon lens. I am using mini dv tape as I have been told there is no difference in quality between mini and full size. Most of the competing shows are using “palmcorders” such as gl2’s and Xl1s. If my Sony is not even broadcast quality then what format do you recommend? My dubbing company required that I record my show to mini dv for them to dub to beta sp.

  • Jeremy Doyle

    July 8, 2009 at 8:49 pm

    As others have said it probably because of working with DV footage.

    Or it could have nothing to do with your process and completely on how the broadcasting station is broadcasting. They are re-compressing your show before it goes to air. It could also be happening as the closed caption is adding another pass to the process. By going from mini dv to beta you’re taking a hit, and depending on where captioning is added, you’re taking another hit. Than a hit at the station as they need to compress it for broadcast. Then there’s the whole issue what system you’re watching it on. Over the air antenna? Satellite? Cable? Over the air would be the best quality. Depending on your Satellite or Cable provider the station you’re airing on my only be alloted so much bandwidth.

    The show you see broadcast will never look as good as the show leaving you’re studio.

    Especially on the Pursuit channel, which is usually a lower bandwidth on any cable/satellite provider.

  • Jeremy Doyle

    July 8, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    double post. sorry.

  • Brandon Carter

    July 8, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    OK…Forgive me as I am new to editing….my wife is the editor. I went into sequence-settings and then changed quick time compression to ProRes 422 from DV/DVCPRO-NTSC. Now under audio/video settings, should I change capture preset to HDV-Apple ProRes 422? What else should I change?

Page 1 of 5

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy