Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects better plugin? Psunami Water or Aurora Water? please comment

  • better plugin? Psunami Water or Aurora Water? please comment

    Posted by Derrick on September 18, 2006 at 2:24 pm

    Hi there,

    I have the urge to spend a little money on a plug-in. I’m thinking a water simulation plug-in could be nice to own.

    So which would you AE users prefer to use? Psunami Water or Aurora Water?

    So far it’s seems Psunami is more flexible?

    Your opinions would be greatly appreciated!

    Thanks,
    Derrick

    David Johnson replied 19 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Roland R. kahlenberg

    September 18, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    I’ve used both – demo versions. Aurora actually seems to have more options upfront. Although Psunami can do most of what Aurora does with a bit of mechanics. I suggest that you download the demos and give them a tryout. Strangely, they both seem to be using the same render engine. It just looks very similar.

    HTH
    Roland Kahlenberg
    broadcastGEMs
    customizable animated backdrops with Adobe After Effects project files

  • David Johnson

    September 19, 2006 at 3:31 am

    I’ve used both as well, but it has been a while and I use neither that often. So, based on my faulty memory, I’d say Psunami is more flexible, but Aurora requires less effort so it depends on your preferences/needs. I don’t at all mean to discourage you from either, but if you don’t have a real need for a water plugin and just want a new toy, I’d say there are plugin sets out there that are far more handy on a day-to-day basis (like Sapphire, BCC or Digital Film Tools). If you’re set on water, I agree it’ll be best to test drive both as they’re both high-quality plugins.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy